<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Historical Documents Archives - Formosan Association for Public Affairs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fapa.org/category/historical-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fapa.org/category/historical-documents/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 23:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">181504243</site>	<item>
		<title>Executive Order 13014 (1996)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/executive-order-13014-1996/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/executive-order-13014-1996/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee Wu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 1996 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Order 13014 (1996)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Executive Order 13014—Maintaining Unofficial Relations With the People on Taiwan President William J. ClintonAugust 15, 1996 In light of the recognition of the People&#8217;s Republic of China by the United States of America as the sole legal government of China, and by the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/executive-order-13014-1996/">Executive Order 13014 (1996)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Executive Order 13014—<br>Maintaining Unofficial Relations With the People on Taiwan</h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">President William J. Clinton<br>August 15, 1996</h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In light of the recognition of the People&#8217;s Republic of China by the United States of America as the sole legal government of China, and by the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America by the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96-8, 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) (&#8220;Act&#8221;), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, in order to facilitate the maintenance of commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan with official representation or diplomatic relations, it is hereby ordered as follows:</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1. Delegation and Reservation of Functions.</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">1-101. Exclusive of the functions otherwise delegated, or reserved to the President by this order, there are delegated to the Secretary of State (&#8220;Secretary&#8221;) all functions conferred upon the President by the Act, in concluding the authority under section 7(a) of the Act to specify which laws of the United State relative to the provision of consular services may be administered by employees of the American Institute on Taiwan (&#8220;Institute&#8221;). In carrying out these functions, the Secretary may redelegate his authority, and shall consult with other departments and agencies as he deems appropriate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">1-102. There are delegated to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management the functions conferred upon the President by paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 11(a) of the Act. These functions shall be exercised in consultation with the Secretary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">1-103. There are reserved to the President the functions conferred upon the President by section 3, the second sentence of section 9(b), and the determination specified in section 10(a) of the Act.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Sec. 2. Specification of Laws and Determinations.</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">2-201. Pursuant to section 9(b) of the Act, and in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, the procurement of services may be effected by the Institute without regard to the following provisions of law and limitations of authority as they may be amended from time to time:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Sections 1301(d) and 1341 of title 31, United States Code, and section 3732 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 11) to the extent necessary to permit the indemnification of contractors against unusually hazardous risks, as defied in Institute contracts, consistent, to the extent practicable, with section 52.228-7 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Section 3324 of title 31, United States Code;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) Sections 3709, 3710, and 3735 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (41 U.S.C. 5, 8, and 13);</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(d) Section 2 of title III of the Act of March 3, 1933 (41 U.S.C. 10a);</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(e) Title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (41 U.S.C. 601-613);</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(f) The Contract Disputes Act of 1978; as amended (41 U.S.C. 601-613);</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(g) Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 2301-2316);</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(h) The Act of May 11, 1954 (the &#8220;Anti-Wunderlich Act&#8221;) (41 U.S.C. 321, 322); and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(i) Section (f) of 41 U.S.C. 423.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">2-202. (a) With respect to cost-type contracts with the Institute under which no fee is charged or paid, amendments and modifications of such contracts may be made with or without consideration and may be utilized to accomplish the same things any original contract could have accomplished, irrespective of the time or circumstances of the making, or the form of the contract amended or modified, or of the amending or modifying contract and irrespective of rights that may have accrued under the contractor the amendments or modifications thereof.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) With respect to contracts heretofore or hereafter made under the act, other than those described in subsection (a) of this section, amendments and modifications of such contracts may be made with or without consideration and may be utilized to accomplish the same things as any original contract could have accomplished, irrespective of the time or circumstances of the making, or the form of the contract amended or modified, or of the amending or modifying contract, and irrespective of rights that may have accrued under the contract or the amendments or modifications thereof, if the Secretary determines in each case that such action is necessary to protect the foreign policy interests of the United States.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">2-203. Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Act, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States (&#8220;TECRO&#8221;), formerly the Coordination Council for North America Affairs (&#8220;CCNAA&#8221;), is determined to be the instrumentality established by the people on Taiwan having the necessary authority under the laws applied by the people on Taiwan to provide assurances and take other actions on behalf of Taiwan in accordance with the Act. Nothing contained in this determination or order shall affect, or be construed to affect, the continued validity of agreements, contracts or other undertakings, of whatever kind or nature, entered into previously by CCNAA.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Sec. 3. President&#8217;s Memorandum of December 30, 1978.</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">3-301 Agreements and arrangements referred to in paragraph (B) of President Carter&#8217;s memorandum of December 30, 1978, entitled &#8220;Relations With the People on Taiwan&#8221; (44 FR 1075) shall, unless otherwise terminated or modified in accordance with law, continue in force and be performed in accordance with the Act and this order.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sec. 4. General. This order supersedes Executive Order No. 12143 of June 22, 1979.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">William J. Clinton The White House,<br>August 15, 1996.<br>[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:24 a.m., August 16, 1996]</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from <a href="https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/">the American Presidency Project</a> of UCSB. You may find the original post&nbsp;<a href="https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13014-maintaining-unofficial-relations-with-the-people-taiwan">HERE</a>.</h6>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/executive-order-13014-1996/">Executive Order 13014 (1996)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/executive-order-13014-1996/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4513</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taiwan Policy Review (1994)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/1994-taiwan-policy-review/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/1994-taiwan-policy-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1994 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1994 Clinton administration undertook a review on U.S. policy toward Taiwan.</p>
<p>In the 1994 review, U.S. pledges to "actively support Taiwan's membership in international organizations accepting non-states as members, and look for ways have Taiwan's voice heard in organizations of states where Taiwan's membership is not possible".  It later  becomes a basis for U.S. Congress to support Taiwan's WHO bid.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/1994-taiwan-policy-review/">Taiwan Policy Review (1994)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Taiwan Policy Review</h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Washington, DC<br>September 27, 1994.<br><strong>Winston Lord, Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs</strong></h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thank you for inviting me to testify on behalf of the Administration on an issue of substantial importance to our policy in the Asia-Pacific region. Our bonds with Taiwan are robust, friendly, growing, and complex.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your invitation is timely. For the first time in 15 years, we have systematically enhanced the ways in which we promote American interests and manage our relationship with Taiwan. The Administration has carefully examined every facet of our unofficial ties, with a view to correcting their anomalies and strengthening their sinews. The President has taken a personal interest in this process and directed that a series of changes be implemented.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lengthy, detailed interagency policy review that we have conducted is the first of its kind launched by any administration of either political party since we shifted recognition to Beijing in 1979. We have consulted with interested members of Congress and the private sector. The foundation of our approach has been to advance U.S. national objectives in our relations with Taiwan and the P.R.C., as well as in the Asia-Pacific area generally. The results, we believe, strike the right balance between Taipei and Beijing, laying the basis for further expanding relations with both while ensuring continued peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Policy Framework</strong></h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The basic framework of our policies toward the P.R.C. and Taiwan remains unchanged. It is worth recalling how durable and productive that policy has been. During 22 years, six administrations of both political parties have closely examined this approach and concluded that it is firmly rooted in U.S. national interests. Throughout this period we have maintained our friendship and ties with Taiwan while advancing our considerable goals with the People&#8217;s Republic of China.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">U.S. policy toward Taiwan is governed, of course, by the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979. Three communiques with the people&#8217;s Republic of China-the Shanghai Communique of 1972, the Normalization Communique of 1979, and the Joint Communique of 1982&#8211;also constitute part of the foundation. In the joint communique shifting diplomatic relations to the P.R.C. 15 years ago, the United States recognized &#8220;the Government of the People&#8217;s Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China.&#8221; The document further states that &#8220;Within this context, the people of the United States will maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan.&#8221; The United States also acknowledged &#8220;the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.&#8221; These formulations were repeated in the 1982 communique. Since 1978, each administration has reaffirmed this policy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The policy has been essential in maintaining peace, stability, and economic development on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and throughout the region. It has buttressed expansion of bilateral contacts between China and Taiwan, including a broadening of social and economic linkages that have improved standards of living both in Taiwan and in the People&#8217;s Republic of China. Meanwhile, the United States has maintained mutually beneficial ties with both the P.R.C. and Taiwan. We have focused our bilateral and multilateral agendas on working cooperatively with each while not putting at unnecessary risk our relations with either. We have made absolutely clear our expectation that cross-strait relations will evolve in a peaceful manner. We neither interfere in nor mediate this process. But we welcome any evolution in relations between Taipei and Beijing that is mutually agreed upon and peacefully reached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the past two decades, Taiwan has been one of the world&#8217;s greatest economic success stories, achieving rapid growth and prosperity. Its security has been enhanced and is more solid than ever. It has taken dramatic strides toward democracy and the fulfillment of human rights. With a small population and modest resources, Taiwan has risen to become one of the world&#8217;s major economic actors, while putting into practice a lively, increasingly representative political system. It has shown that political openness must accompany economic reform and that Asians value freedom as much as other peoples around the globe.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These remarkable developments are a tribute, above all, to the talents and energy of the people of Taiwan and to their enlightened leaders. They also reflect the soundness of bipartisan U.S. policies pursued through successive administrations. We have been faithful to Taiwan while addressing our wide range of goals with Beijing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time, in recent years, changes of a profound nature have taken place in the People&#8217;s Republic of China. The P.R.C. is undergoing a significant transition from a command to a market economy that has brought unprecedented prosperity to millions. It has opened up to the outside world, but it clings to a repressive political system. It is an increasingly important player on the world stage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the end, it is only the two parties themselves&#8211;Taiwan and the P.R.C. &#8211;that will be able to resolve the issues between them. In this regard, the United States applauds the continuing progress in the cross-strait dialogue. The record is one of slow but not inconsequential advance. We should not underestimate the significance of two parties&#8211;who have a history of bitter enmity-getting together to discuss issues. While credit must go, first of all, to each for enhancing their dialogue, U.S. policy has contributed to a climate which has fostered not only these growing exchanges but also trade, investment, and travel between them. This trend toward contact and dialogue serves the interests of both parties and the United States and of regional stability and prosperity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Taiwan&#8217;s security is one of the most important aspects of our policy. Meeting the needs of Taiwan is critical not only for Taiwan but also for peace and stability in the region. We will continue to provide material and training to Taiwan to enable it to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability, as mandated by the Taiwan Relations Act.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is no change in our arms sales policy as a result of the adjustments we are undertaking. Our sales to Taiwan will remain fully consistent with both the Taiwan Relations Act and the 1982 U.S.-P.R.C. communique. These documents are complementary and support the same basic objectives&#8211;peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Policy Adjustments</strong></h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Within this framework, the President has decided to enhance our unofficial ties with Taiwan. Our goal is to reinforce the success of the fundamental policy approach I have outlined, which has promoted peace and growth in the region, while accommodating changing circumstances in ways that advance U.S. interests. We believe it would be a serious mistake to derail this basic policy of several administrations by introducing what China would undoubtedly perceive as officiality in our relations with Taiwan. This is why the Administration strongly opposes Congressional attempts to legislate visits by top leaders of the &#8220;Republic of China&#8221; to the U.S.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let me give you the highlights of our changes. Taken together, they represent a significant advance while remaining faithful to the undertakings of several administrations of both political parties to Beijing. I will be pleased to provide more details later in response to your questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We are now prepared to send high-level officials from U.S. economic and technical agencies to visit Taiwan. We will make judgments as to what level of visitor best serves our interests. They will have meetings at whatever levels necessary to accomplish our objectives. We are also prepared to establish a sub-cabinet economic dialogue with Taiwan. Moreover, last week we signed a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement and anticipate an early commencement of talks. We also are making some changes in the ways we promote our commercial and technical interests in Washington, including where meetings can be held.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Taiwan will have a new name for its office here&#8211;the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office. Recognizing Taiwan&#8217;s important role in transnational issues, we will support its membership in organizations where statehood is not a prerequisite, and we will support opportunities for Taiwan&#8217;s voice to be heard in organizations where its membership is not possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Due in significant part to a well-conceived and consistent U.S. policy since 1979, U.S. and Taiwan relations are thriving. We can conduct any important business. Our trade and investment levels are high and rising. Some 37,000 students from Taiwan study in the U.S.-the second-highest number in the world. Thanks to our efforts, Taiwan is a valued member of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum&#8211;the most important regional economic body in Asia. It is engaged in serious, productive negotiations which will lead to its accession to GATT.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Conclusion</strong></h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mr. Chairman, U.S. policy toward Taiwan has been a major bipartisan success story through several administrations. It is balanced, it is faithful to our obligations, our commitments, and our national purposes. It promotes our goals with both the P.R.C. and with Taiwan. Relations with the P.R.C. are official and diplomatic; with Taiwan, they are unofficial but strong. We do not believe that we can or should tamper with this successful formula. We do not seek and cannot impose a resolution of differences between Taiwan and the People&#8217;s Republic of China. Nor should we permit one to manipulate us against the other.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What we can do&#8211;and what we have just done is the most thorough review and adjustment in 15 years&#8211;is to strengthen our unofficial relations with Taiwan, permit the expansion of ties with the P.R.C., promote regional peace and development, and serve American national interests. Thank you.</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from the American Institute in Taiwan website. You may find the original post <a href="https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/en/19940927-taiwan-policy-review-by-winston-lord.html">HERE</a>.</h6>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/1994-taiwan-policy-review/">Taiwan Policy Review (1994)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/1994-taiwan-policy-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4509</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taiwan Guidelines (1990)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/taiwan-guidelines-1990/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/taiwan-guidelines-1990/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 1990 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan Guidelines (1990)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Taiwan Guidelines October 3, 1990A MEMORANDUM to Mr. Brent Scowcroft (National Security Affairs Advisor), Mr. James R. Pittman (Acting Executive Secretary, CIA), Colonel John A. Dubia (Executive Secretary, DoD) from Department of State This memorandum reviews the existing guidelines for the conduct of our unofficial relations with the people on Taiwan. Please ensure that they [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/taiwan-guidelines-1990/">Taiwan Guidelines (1990)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Taiwan Guidelines</h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">October 3, 1990<br>A MEMORANDUM to Mr. Brent Scowcroft (National Security Affairs Advisor), Mr. James R. Pittman (Acting Executive Secretary, CIA), Colonel John A. Dubia (Executive Secretary, DoD) from Department of State</h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This memorandum reviews the existing guidelines for the conduct of our unofficial relations with the people on Taiwan. Please ensure that they receive broad circulation within your Department or Agency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In establishing diplomatic relations with the People&#8217;s Republic of China (PRC), the U.S. Government recognized the PRC Government as the sole legal government of China. Both sides agreed that, within this context, the people of the United States would maintain cultural, commercial and other unofficial relations with the people on Taiwan. The President has reaffirmed this policy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) (Public Law 96-8 of April 10, 1979) provides the legal framework for the conduct of these unofficial relations. In the absence of diplomatic ties, the TRA stipulates that programs, transactions, and other relations conducted or carried out by the President or any agency of the U.S. Government with respect to Taiwan shall be conducted and carried out by or through the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). AIT, a nonprofit corporation headquartered in Rosslyn, VA, with offices in Taipei and Kaohsiung on Taiwan, is under contract to the Department of State to perform these functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Taiwan has established a counterpart organization to AIT called the Coordination Council for North American Affairs (CCNAA). CCNAA has its U.S. headquarters in Washington, DC and other offices in major cities around the United States The unofficial relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan are carried out through these two private organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This framework has proven effective; trade and other unofficial relations with Taiwan have expanded dramatically since 1979.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Guidelines for specific areas of the conduct of unofficial relations with Taiwan are as follows:</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Terminology</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Consistent with the unofficial nature of U.S.-Taiwan ties, the U.S. Government no longer refers to Taiwan as the &#8220;Republic of China&#8221; — a term reflecting Taipei&#8217;s continuing claim to be the government of China. Nor does the U.S. Government refer to Taiwan as a &#8220;country&#8221; or a &#8220;government.&#8221; We refer to Taiwan simply as Taiwan, and to its leadership as &#8220;the Taiwan authorities.&#8221;</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Correspondence</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive Branch departments and agencies should not correspond directly with their counterparts on Taiwan or with CCNAA. All such correspondence must take place through, and under the auspices of, AIT. This usually takes the form of a letter from AIT Washington or AIT Taipei, incorporating the view of the concerned U.S. department or agency, to CCNAA in Washington or Taipei.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Unofficial Meetings and Contacts</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Guidelines concerning unofficial meetings and contacts between Executive Branch personnel and CCNAA, or visitors from Taiwan, are complex. In general, these should take place at AIT or in other non-official settings — not in Executive Branch offices. Questions should be directed to the Taiwan Coordination Staff (EAP/RA/TC) at the Department of State (telephone 202-647-7711).</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Twin Oaks</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive Branch personnel may not attend functions at Twin Oaks, the former residence of the &#8220;Republic of China&#8221; Ambassador. They may, however, accept invitations to social functions held at homes of CCNAA personnel.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">&#8220;Double Ten&#8221; Celebrations</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Taiwan authorities celebrate October 10 as the anniversary of the founding of the &#8220;Republic of China.&#8221; In general, officials at all levels of the foreign affairs agencies (State, NSC/White House, Defense, and CIA), as well as officials above the rank of GS-14 from any other part of the Executive Branch, may not attend the formal CCNAA reception held on that day. Questions regarding attendance by Executive Branch personnel at receptions hosted by CCNAA in honor of this event on other days should be directed to the Taiwan Coordination Staff.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Travel</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive Branch personnel who contemplate travel to Taiwan for work-related reasons must have prior concurrence from the Taiwan Coordination Staff (fax 202-647-7350). Such personnel travel to Taiwan as consultants to AIT. Senior Executive Branch officials at -3- or above the level of assistant secretary, embassy counselor or consul general, and three star flag officer must obtain clearance from the State Department for personal travel as well. All travel must be on a regular (tourist) passport.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Gifts</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">U.S. law and government guidelines on gifts from foreign sources, including travel expenses, apply to Executive Branch personnel in their relations with Taiwan and CCNAA. Questions should be directed to the concerned recipient&#8217;s department or agency ethics office. Questions on policy matters related to these guidelines should be directed to the Taiwan Coordination Staff of the Department of State.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Questions on the actual conduct or procedural implementation of our unofficial relations should be directed to AIT (telephone 703-525-8474).</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from the American Institute in the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum. You may find the original post&nbsp;<a href="https://bush41library.tamu.edu/files/1999-0182-F/SO_DP_TAIWANUS_91(3)_333.pdf">HERE</a>.</h6>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/taiwan-guidelines-1990/">Taiwan Guidelines (1990)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/taiwan-guidelines-1990/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4511</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>1982 Communique (1982)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1982/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1982/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1982 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982 Communique (1982)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the Second Shanghai Communiqué, the provisions of the (first) Shanghai Communiqué were reiterated. It declared that the US recognizes the Government of the PRC as the sole legitimate government of China, and it acknowledged the Chinese position that there is but one China and that Taiwan is part of China. During the conclusion of the Communiqué, the Chinese government restated that the Taiwan question is China's internal affair. The US stated that "it has no intention of pursuing a policy of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan."</p>
<p>The question of US arms sales to Taiwan was not settled when US-PRC diplomatic relations were established. In this Communiqué, the US stated that "it intends to reduce gradually its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading over a period of time to a final resolution."</p>
<p>* Importance: By means of this Communiqué, the US expresses its support for a peaceful solution of Taiwan’s status.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1982/">1982 Communique (1982)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Joint Communiqué of the United States of America and&nbsp;the People&#8217;s Republic of China</h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Also Known as the 1982 Communique<br><strong>August 17, 1982</strong></h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the Joint Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations on January 1, 1979, issued by the Government of the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China, the United States of America recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China, and it acknowledged the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China. Within that context, the two sides agreed that the people of the United States would continue to maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan. On this basis, relations between the United States and China were normalized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question of United States arms sales to Taiwan was not settled in the course&nbsp;of negotiations between the two countries on establishing diplomatic relations. The two sides held differing positions, and the Chinese side stated that it would raise the issue again following normalization. Recognizing that this issue would seriously hamper the development of United States – China relations, they have held further discussions on it, during and since the meetings between President Ronald Reagan and Premier Zhao Ziyang and between Secretary of State Alexander M. Haig, Jr. and Vice Premier and Foreign Minister Huang Hua in October 1981.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Respect for each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and non-interference in each other’s internal affairs constitute the fundamental principles guiding United States China relations. These principles were confirmed in the Shanghai Communique of February 28, 1972 and reaffirmed in the Joint Communique on the Establishment Of Diplomatic Relations which came into effect on January 1, 1979. Both sides emphatically state that these principles continue to govern all aspects of their relations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chinese Government reiterates that the question of Taiwan is China’s internal affair. The Message to Compatriots in Taiwan issued by China on January 1, 1979 promulgated a fundamental policy of striving for peaceful reunification of the motherland. The Nine-Point Proposal put forward by China on September 30, 1981 represented a further major effort under this fundamental policy to strive for a peaceful solution to the Taiwan question.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The United States Government attaches great importance to its relations with China, and reiterates that it has no intention of infringing on Chinese sovereignty and territorial integrity, or interfering in China’s internal affairs, or pursuing a policy of “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.” The United States Government understands and appreciates the Chinese policy of striving for a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan question as indicated in China’s Message to Compatriots in Taiwan issued on January 1, 1979 and the Nine-Point Proposal put forward by China on September 30, 1981. The new situation which has emerged with regard to the Taiwan question also provides favorable conditions for the settlement of United States – China differences over United States arms sales to Taiwan.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Having in mind the foregoing statements of both sides, the United States Government states that it does not seek to carry out a long-term policy of arms sales to Taiwan, that its arms sales to Taiwan will not exceed, either in qualitative or in quantitative terms, the level of those supplied in recent years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and China, and that it intends gradually to reduce its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading, over a period of time, to a final resolution. In so stating, the United States acknowledges China’s consistent position regarding the thorough settlement of this issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to bring about, over a period of time, a final settlement of the question of United States arms sales to Taiwan, which is an issue rooted in history, the two Governments will make every effort to adopt measures and create conditions conducive to the thorough settlement of this issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The development of United States – China relations is not only in the interests of the two peoples but also conducive to peace and stability in the world. The two sides are determined, on the principle of equality and mutual benefit, to strengthen their ties in the economic, cultural, educational, scientific, technological and other fields and make strong, joint efforts for the continued development of relations between the Governments and peoples of the United States and China.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to bring about the healthy development of United States – China relations, maintain world peace and oppose aggression and expansion, the two Governments reaffirm the principles agreed on by the two sides in the Shanghai Communique and the Joint Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations. The two sides will maintain contact and hold appropriate consultations on bilateral and international issues of common interest.</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<div class="wp-block-group has-text-color" style="color:#656e76"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph">Note: In an internal presidential memo, dated August 17, 1982, President Ronald Reagan provides his interpretation of the Communique:</p>



<p class="has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph">As you know, I have agreed to the issuance of a joint communique with the People’s Republic of China in which we express United States policy toward the matter of continuing arms sales to Taiwan.</p>



<p class="has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph">The talks leading up to the signing of the communique were premised on the clear understanding that any reduction of such arms sales depends upon peace in the Taiwan Straits and the continuity of China’s declared “fundamental policy” of seeking a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue.</p>



<p class="has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph">In addition, it is essential that the quality and quantity of the arms provided Taiwan be conditioned entirely on the threat posed by the PRC.&nbsp; Both in quantitative and qualitative terms, Taiwan’s defense capability relative to that of the PRC will be maintained.</p>



<p class="has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph">In short, the U.S. willingness to reduce its arms sales to Taiwan is conditioned absolutely upon the continued commitment of China to the peaceful solution of the Taiwan-PRC differences.&nbsp; It should be clearly understood that the linkage between these two matters is a permanent imperative of U.S. foreign policy.</p>
</div></div>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from the American Institute in Taiwan website. You may find the original post <a href="https://www.ait.org.tw/our-relationship/policy-history/key-u-s-foreign-policy-documents-region/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1982/">HERE</a>.</h6>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1982/">1982 Communique (1982)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4503</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Reagan&#8217;s Six Assurances (1982)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/president-reagans-six-assurances/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/president-reagans-six-assurances/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 1982 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Before President Reagan was going to sign the second communiqué with China in 1982, he sent then Assistant Secretary of State, John Holdridge to deliver six points (later so called "Six Assurances) to then President of Taiwan, Chiang Chin-ko.  The assurances are deemed by some that it contradicts the 1982 Communiqué.  Nevertheless, the six assurances are to assure the Taiwanese government with U.S. commitment to Taiwan's sovereignty and the rights to purchase advanced arms from the U.S.  Over the years, many scholars argue that the importance of the "Six Assurances" is underestimated and should be part of the official U.S. policy toward Taiwan and China, in addition to Taiwan Relations Act and three Communiqué. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/president-reagans-six-assurances/">President Reagan&#8217;s Six Assurances (1982)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading"><strong>The &#8220;Six Assurances&#8221; to Taiwan</strong></h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading"><strong>July 1982</strong></h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp;In 1982, during negotiations for the&nbsp;<a href="https://fapa.org/archives/4503">Third United States &#8211; China Joint Communiqué</a>&nbsp;on Arms Sales to Taiwan, the Taiwan government presented the United States with six points that it proposed the United States use as guidelines in conducting United States &#8211; Taiwan relations. According to former Ambassador John Holdridge, the United States agreed to these points, conveyed this assent to Taiwan, and, in late July 1982, informed the Congress of the agreement. The six points are:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The United States would not set a date for termination of arms sales to Taiwan.</li><li>The United States would not alter the terms of the&nbsp;<a href="https://fapa.org/archives/4497">Taiwan Relations Act</a>.</li><li>The United States would not consult with China in advance before making decisions about U.S. arms sales to Taiwan.</li><li>The United States would not mediate between Taiwan and China.</li><li>The United States would not alter its position about the sovereignty of Taiwan which was, that the question was one to be decided peacefully by the Chinese themselves, and would not pressure Taiwan to enter into negotiations with China.</li><li>The United States would not formally recognize Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.</li></ol>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Printed with the Permission of <a href="http://www.taiwandocuments.org/assurances.htm">Taiwan Document Project</a></h6>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/president-reagans-six-assurances/">President Reagan&#8217;s Six Assurances (1982)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/president-reagans-six-assurances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4505</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taiwan Relations Act (1979)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/taiwan-relations-act-1979/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/taiwan-relations-act-1979/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1979 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan Relations Act (1979)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) was initiated by Congress and signed into law by President Carter. US-Taiwan diplomatic relations had been terminated three months earlier. The US Congress found it necessary to enact the TRA.</p>
<p>The TRA created the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) - a private corporation to handle "unofficial relations" between Taiwan and the US.</p>
<p>Important clauses in the TRA are: It is the policy of the US 1) to declare that peace and stability in the area are in the political, security and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern; 2) to make clear that the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the PRC rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means; 3) to consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means ... a threat to the peace and security of the western Pacific area and of grave concern to the US; 4) to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character;</p>
<p>PRC leaders see the TRA as aimed at "preventing China's reunification" and have demanded its revocation.</p>
<p>* Importance: The US vows that the US decision to establish diplomatic relations with the PRC rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means. The TRA played an important role in March 1996, when the US sent aircraft carriers to the Taiwan Strait in the midst of Chinese war games aimed at Taiwan.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/taiwan-relations-act-1979/">Taiwan Relations Act (1979)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Taiwan Relations Act</h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">PUBLIC LAW 96-8 96TH CONGRESS<br>April 10, 1979</h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">An Act</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To help maintain peace, security, and stability in the Western Pacific and to promote the foreign policy of the United States by authorizing the continuation of commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan, and for other purposes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Short Title</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the “Taiwan Relations Act”.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Findings and Declaration of Policy</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 2.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The President- having terminated governmental relations between the United States and the governing authorities on Taiwan recognized by the United States as the Republic of China prior to January 1, 1979, the Congress finds that the enactment of this Act is necessary–<ol><li>to help maintain peace, security, and stability in the Western Pacific; and</li><li>to promote the foreign policy of the United States by authorizing the continuation of commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan.</li></ol></li><li>It is the policy of the United States–<ol><li>to preserve and promote extensive, close, and friendly commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan, as well as the people on the China mainland and all other peoples of the Western Pacific area;</li><li>to declare that peace and stability in the area are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern;</li><li>to make clear that the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China rests upon <strong>the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means</strong>;</li><li>to consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, <strong>a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States</strong>;</li><li>to <strong>provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character</strong>; and</li><li>to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan.</li></ol></li><li>Nothing contained in this Act shall contravene the interest of the United States in human rights, especially with respect to the human rights of all the approximately eighteen million inhabitants of Taiwan. The preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the United States.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation of United States Policy with Regard to Taiwan</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 3.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>In furtherance of the policy set forth in section 2 of this Act, the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.</li><li>The President and the Congress shall determine the nature and quantity of such defense articles and services based solely upon their judgment of the needs of Taiwan, in accordance with procedures established by law. Such determination of Taiwan’s defense needs shall include review by United States military authorities in connection with recommendations to the President and the Congress.</li><li>The President is directed to inform the Congress promptly of any threat to the security or the social or economic system of the people on Taiwan and any danger to the interests of the United States arising therefrom. The President and the Congress shall determine, in accordance with constitutional processes, appropriate action by the United States in response to any such danger.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Application of Laws; International Agreements</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 4.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The absence of diplomatic relations or recognition shall not affect the application of the laws of the United States with respect to Taiwan, and the laws of the United States shall apply with respect to Taiwan in the manner that the laws of the United States applied with respect to Taiwan prior to January 1, 1979.</li><li>The application of subsection (a) of this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:<ol><li>Whenever the laws of the United States refer or relate to foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities, such terms shall include and such laws shall apply with such respect to Taiwan.</li><li>Whenever authorized by or pursuant to the laws of the United States to conduct or carry out programs, transactions, or other relations with respect to foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities, the President or any agency of the United States Government is authorized to conduct and carry out, in accordance with section 6 of this Act, such programs, transactions, and other relations with respect to Taiwan (including, but not limited to, the performance of services for the United States through contracts with commercial entities on Taiwan), in accordance with the applicable laws of the United States.<ol><li>The absence of diplomatic relations and recognition with respect to Taiwan shall not abrogate, infringe, modify, deny, or otherwise affect in any way any rights or obligations (including but not limited to those involving contracts, debts, or property interests of any kind) under the laws of the United States heretofore or hereafter acquired by or with respect to Taiwan.</li><li>For all purposes under the laws of the United States, including actions in any court in the United States, recognition of the People’s Republic of China shall not affect in any way the ownership of or other rights or interests in properties, tangible and intangible, and other things of value, owned or held on or prior to December 31, 1978, or thereafter acquired or earned by the governing authorities on Taiwan.</li></ol></li><li>Whenever the application of the laws of the United States depends upon the law that is or was applicable on Taiwan or compliance therewith, the law applied by the people on Taiwan shall be considered the applicable law for that purpose.</li><li>Nothing in this Act, nor the facts of the President’s action in extending diplomatic recognition to the People’s Republic of China, the absence of diplomatic relations between the people on Taiwan and the United States, or the lack of recognition by the United States, and attendant circumstances thereto, shall be construed in any administrative or judicial proceeding as a basis for any United States Government agency, commission, or department to make a finding of fact or determination of law, under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, to deny an export license application or to revoke an existing export license for nuclear exports to Taiwan.</li><li>For purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Taiwan may be treated in the manner specified in the first sentence of section 202(b) of that Act.</li><li>The capacity of Taiwan to sue and be sued in courts in the United States, in accordance with the laws of the United States, shall not be abrogated, infringed, modified, denied, or otherwise affected in any way by the absence of diplomatic relations or recognition.</li><li>No requirement, whether expressed or implied, under the laws of the United States with respect to maintenance of diplomatic relations or recognition shall be applicable with respect to Taiwan.</li></ol></li><li>For all purposes, including actions in any court in the United States, the Congress approves the continuation in force of all treaties and other international agreements, including multilateral conventions, entered into by the United States and the governing authorities on Taiwan recognized by the United States as the Republic of China prior to January 1, 1979, and in force between them on December 31, 1978, unless and until terminated in accordance with law.</li><li>Nothing in this Act may be construed as a basis for supporting the exclusion or expulsion of Taiwan from continued membership in any international financial institution or any other international organization.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Overseas Private Investment Corporation</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 5.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>During the three-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the $1,000 per capita income restriction in insurance, clause (2) of the second undesignated paragraph of section 231 of the reinsurance, Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 shall not restrict the activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation in determining whether to provide any insurance, reinsurance, loans, or guaranties with respect to investment projects on Taiwan.</li><li>Except as provided in subsection (a) of this section, in issuing insurance, reinsurance, loans, or guaranties with respect to investment projects on Taiwan, the Overseas Private Insurance Corporation shall apply the same criteria as those applicable in other parts of the world.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">The American Institute of Taiwan</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 6.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Programs, transactions, and other relations conducted or carried out by the President or any agency of the United States Government with respect to Taiwan shall, in the manner and to the extent directed by the President, be conducted and carried out by or through–<ol><li>The American Institute in Taiwan, a nonprofit corporation incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia, or</li><li>such comparable successor nongovermental entity as the President may designate, (hereafter in this Act referred to as the “Institute”).</li></ol></li><li>Whenever the President or any agency of the United States Government is authorized or required by or pursuant to the laws of the United States to enter into, perform, enforce, or have in force an agreement or transaction relative to Taiwan, such agreement or transaction shall be entered into, performed, and enforced, in the manner and to the extent directed by the President, by or through the Institute.</li><li>To the extent that any law, rule, regulation, or ordinance of the District of Columbia, or of any State or political subdivision thereof in which the Institute is incorporated or doing business, impedes or otherwise interferes with the performance of the functions of the Institute pursuant to this Act; such law, rule, regulation, or ordinance shall be deemed to be preempted by this Act.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Services by the Institute to United States Citizens on Taiwan</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 7.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Institute may authorize any of its employees on Taiwan–<ol><li>to administer to or take from any person an oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition, and to perform any notarial act which any notary public is required or authorized by law to perform within the United States;</li><li>To act as provisional conservator of the personal estates of deceased United States citizens; and</li><li>to assist and protect the interests of United States persons by performing other acts such as are authorized to be performed outside the United States for consular purposes by such laws of the United States as the President may specify.</li></ol></li><li>Acts performed by authorized employees of the Institute under this section shall be valid, and of like force and effect within the United States, as if performed by any other person authorized under the laws of the United States to perform such acts.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Tax Exempt Status of the Institute</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SECTION. 8.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Institute, its property, and its income are exempt from all taxation now or hereafter imposed by the United States (except to the extent that section 11(a)(3) of this Act requires the imposition of taxes imposed under chapter 21 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, relating to the Federal Insurance Contributions Act) or by State or local taxing authority of the United States.</li><li>For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the Institute shall be treated as an organization described in sections 170(b)(1)(A), 170(c), 2055(a), 2106(a)(2)(A),, 2522(a), and 2522(b).</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">FURNISHING PROPERTY AND SERVICES TO AND OBTAINING SERVICES FROM THE INSTITUTE</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 9.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Any agency of the United States Government is authorized to sell, loan, or lease property (including interests therein) to, and to perform administrative and technical support functions and services for the operations of, the Institute upon such terms and conditions as the President may direct. Reimbursements to agencies under this subsection shall be credited to the current applicable appropriation of the agency concerned.</li><li>Any agency of the United States Government is authorized to acquire and accept services from the Institute upon such terms and conditions as the President may direct. Whenever the President determines it to be in furtherance of the purposes of this Act, the procurement of services by such agencies from the Institute may be effected without regard to such laws of the United States normally applicable to the acquisition of services by such agencies as the President may specify by Executive order.</li><li>Any agency of the United States Government making funds available to the Institute in accordance with this Act shall make arrangements with the Institute for the Comptroller General of the United States to have access to the; books and records of the Institute and the opportunity to audit the operations of the Institute.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Taiwan Instrumentality</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 10.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Whenever the President or any agency of the United States Government is authorized or required by or pursuant to the laws of the United States to render or provide to or to receive or accept from Taiwan, any performance, communication, assurance, undertaking, or other action, such action shall, in the manner and to the. extent directed by the President, be rendered or Provided to, or received or accepted from, an instrumentality established by Taiwan which the President determines has the necessary authority under the laws applied by the people on Taiwan to provide assurances and take other actions on behalf of Taiwan in accordance with this Act.</li><li>The President is requested to extend to the instrumentality established by Taiwan the same number of offices and complement of personnel as were previously operated in the United States by the governing authorities on Taiwan recognized as the Republic of China prior to January 1, 1979.</li><li>Upon the granting by Taiwan of comparable privileges and immunities with respect to the Institute and its appropriate personnel, the President is authorized to extend with respect to the Taiwan instrumentality and its appropriate; personnel, such privileges and immunities (subject to appropriate conditions and obligations) as may be necessary for the effective performance of their functions.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Separation of Government Personnel for Employment with the Institute</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 11.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Under such terms and conditions as the President may direct, any agency of the United States Government may separate from Government service for a specified period any officer or employee of that agency who accepts employment with the Institute.</li><li>An officer or employee separated by an agency under paragraph (1) of this subsection for employment with the Institute shall be entitled upon termination of such employment to reemployment or reinstatement with such agency (or a successor agency) in an appropriate position with the attendant rights, privileges, and benefits with the officer or employee would have had or acquired had he or she not been so separated, subject to such time period and other conditions as the President may prescribe.</li><li>An officer or employee entitled to reemployment or reinstatement rights under paragraph (2) of this subsection shall, while continuously employed by the Institute with no break in continuity of service, continue to participate in any benefit program in which such officer or employee was participating prior to employment by the Institute, including programs for compensation for job-related death, injury, or illness; programs for health and life insurance; programs for annual, sick, and other statutory leave; and programs for retirement under any system established by the laws of the United States; except that employment with the Institute shall be the basis for participation in such programs only to the extent that employee deductions and employer contributions, as required, in payment for such participation for the period of employment with the Institute, are currently deposited in the program’s or system’s fund or depository. Death or retirement of any such officer or employee during approved service with the Institute and prior to reemployment or reinstatement shall be considered a death in or retirement from Government service for purposes of any employee or survivor benefits acquired by reason of service with an agency of the United States Government.</li><li>Any officer or employee of an agency of the United States Government who entered into service with the Institute on approved leave of absence without pay prior to the enactment of this Act shall receive the benefits of this section for the period of such service.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Reporting Requirement</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 12.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Secretary of State shall transmit to the Congress the text of any agreement to which the Institute is a party. However, any such agreement the immediate public disclosure of which would, in the opinion of the President, be prejudicial to the national security of the United States shall not be so transmitted to the Congress but shall be transmitted to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives under an appropriate injunction of secrecy to be removed only upon due notice from the President.</li><li>For purposes of subsection (a), the term “agreement” includes-<ol><li>any agreement entered into between the Institute and the governing authorities on Taiwan or the instrumentality established by Taiwan; and</li><li>any agreement entered into between the Institute and an agency of the United States Government.</li></ol></li><li>Agreements and transactions made or to be made by or through the Institute shall be subject to the same congressional notification, review, and approval requirements and procedures as if such agreements and transactions were made by or through the agency of the United States Government on behalf of which the Institute is acting.</li><li>During the two-year period beginning on the effective date of this Act, the Secretary of State shall transmit to the Speaker of the House and Senate House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of Foreign Relations the Senate, every six months, a report describing and reviewing economic relations between the United States and Taiwan, noting any interference with normal commercial relations.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">RULES AND REGULATIONS</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SECTION. 13.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The President is authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations as he may deem appropriate to carry out the purposes of this Act. During the three-year period beginning on the effective date speaker of this Act, such rules and regulations shall be transmitted promptly to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. Such action shall not, however, relieve the Institute of the responsibilities placed upon it by this Act.’</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Congressional Oversight</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 14.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and other appropriate committees of the Congress shall monitor-<ol><li>the implementation of the provisions of this Act;</li><li>the operation and procedures of the Institute;</li><li>the legal and technical aspects of the continuing relationship between the United States and Taiwan; and</li><li>the implementation of the policies of the United States concerning security and cooperation in East Asia.</li></ol></li><li>Such committees shall report, as appropriate, to their respective Houses on the results of their monitoring.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Definitions</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 15. For purposes of this Act-</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>the term “laws of the United States” includes any statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, or judicial rule of decision of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and</li><li>the term “Taiwan” includes, as the context may require, the islands of Taiwan and the Pescadores, the people on those islands, corporations and other entities and associations created or organized under the laws applied on those islands, and the governing authorities on Taiwan recognized by the United States as the Republic of China prior to January 1, 1979, and any successor governing authorities (including political subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof).</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Authorization of Appropriations</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 16.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition to funds otherwise available to carry out the provisions of this Act, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State for the fiscal year 1980 such funds as may be necessary to carry out such provisions. Such funds are authorized to remain available until expended.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Severability of Provisions</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 17.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Effective Date</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Section. 18.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This Act shall be effective as of January 1, 1979. Approved April 10, 1979.</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from the American Institute in Taiwan website. You may find the original post <a href="https://www.ait.org.tw/our-relationship/policy-history/key-u-s-foreign-policy-documents-region/taiwan-relations-act/">HERE</a>.</h6>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/taiwan-relations-act-1979/">Taiwan Relations Act (1979)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/taiwan-relations-act-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4497</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Normalization Communique (1979)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/normalization-communique-1979/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/normalization-communique-1979/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1979 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Normalization Communique (1979)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On January 1, 1979, the US and the PRC agreed to recognize each other and established diplomatic relations. Within this context, the US vowed to maintain "cultural, commercial and other unofficial relations" with the people of Taiwan. The US and the PRC reaffirmed: "The US acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China."<br />
President Carter pledged: "We will continue to have an interest in the peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue. I have paid special attention to ensuring that normalization of relations between our country and the PRC will not jeopardize the well being of the people of Taiwan."<br />
Through this treaty, the US vows to continue to seek a peaceful resolution of Taiwan's status. The treaty guarantees that -although the US established diplomatic relations with the PRC- the people of Taiwan are not abandoned.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/normalization-communique-1979/">Normalization Communique (1979)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Joint Communique of the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China </h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Commonly Known as the Normalization Communique<br>January 1, 1979<br></h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The communique was released on December 15, 1978, in Washington and Beijing.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The United States of America and the People’s Republic of China have agreed to recognize each other and to establish diplomatic relations as of January 1, 1979.</li><li>The United States of America recognizes the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China. <strong>Within this context, the people of the United States will maintain cultural, commercial, and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan.</strong></li><li>The United States of America and the People’s Republic of China reaffirm the principles agreed on by the two sides in the Shanghai Communique and emphasize once again that:</li><li>Both wish to reduce the danger of international military conflict.</li><li>Neither should seek hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region or in any other region of the world and each is opposed to efforts by any other country or group of countries to establish such hegemony.</li><li>Neither is prepared to negotiate on behalf of any third party or to enter into agreements or understandings with the other directed at other states.</li><li>The Government of the United States of America <strong>acknowledges</strong> <strong>the Chinese position</strong> that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.</li><li>Both believe that normalization of Sino-American relations is not only in the interest of the Chinese and American peoples but also contributes to the cause of peace in Asia and the world.</li></ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The United States of America and the People’s Republic of China will exchange Ambassadors and establish Embassies on March 1, 1979.</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from the American Institute in Taiwan website. You may find the original post <a href="https://www.ait.org.tw/our-relationship/policy-history/key-u-s-foreign-policy-documents-region/u-s-prc-joint-communique-1979/">HERE</a>.</h6>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/normalization-communique-1979/">Normalization Communique (1979)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/normalization-communique-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4493</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shanghai Communiqué (1972)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/shanghai-communique/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 1972 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanghai Communiqué (1972)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1972, the Cold War produced a rapprochement in Sino-American relations to counter the threat the USSR posed. In the Shanghai Communiqué, the US initiated a "One China Policy," although Taiwan had never been part of China. The US abandoned Taiwan and its people to clear the path for establishing diplomatic relations with the PRC, resulting in Taiwan's complete diplomatic and political isolation.</p>
<p>The collapse of the USSR has removed the Soviet threat and rendered the old US strategy of the US playing the "China Card" obsolete. A revision of the 1972 Communiqué should be called for to grant Taiwan the international status and recognition it deserves. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/shanghai-communique/">Shanghai Communiqué (1972)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Joint Statement Following Discussions With Leaders of the People’s Republic of China</h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Commonly known as the Shanghai Communiqué<br>Shanghai,&nbsp;February 27, 1972</h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-css-opacity"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">President&nbsp;Richard Nixon&nbsp;of the United States of America visited the People’s Republic of China at the invitation of Premier Chou Enlai of the People’s Republic of China from February 21 to February 28, 1972. Accompanying the President were Mrs.&nbsp;Nixon, U.S. Secretary of State&nbsp;William Rogers, Assistant to the President Dr.&nbsp;Henry Kissinger, and other American officials.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">President&nbsp;Nixon&nbsp;met with Chairman&nbsp;Mao Tse-tung&nbsp;of the Communist Party of China on February 21. The two leaders had a serious and frank exchange of views on Sino-U.S. relations and world affairs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the visit, extensive, earnest, and frank discussions were held between President&nbsp;Nixon&nbsp;and Premier&nbsp;Chou En-lai&nbsp;on the normalization of relations between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China, as well as on other matters of interest to both sides. In addition, Secretary of State&nbsp;William Rogers&nbsp;and Foreign Minister&nbsp;Chi P’eng-fei&nbsp;held talks in the same spirit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">President&nbsp;Nixon&nbsp;and his party visited Peking and viewed cultural, industrial and agricultural sites, and they also toured Hangchow and Shanghai where, continuing discussions with Chinese leaders, they viewed similar places of interest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The leaders of the People’s Republic of China and the United States of America found it beneficial to have this opportunity, after so many years without contact, to present candidly to one another their views on a variety of issues. They reviewed the international situation in which important changes and great upheavals are taking place and expounded their respective positions and attitudes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The U.S. side stated: Peace in Asia and peace in the world requires efforts both to reduce immediate tensions and to eliminate the basic causes of conflict. The United States will work for a just and secure peace: just, because it fulfills the aspirations of peoples and nations for freedom and progress; secure, because it removes the danger of foreign aggression. The United States supports individual freedom and social progress for all the peoples of the world, free of outside pressure or intervention. The United States believes that the effort to&nbsp;<a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/pg_813">[Page 813]</a>reduce tensions is served by improving communication between countries that have different ideologies so as to lessen the risks of confrontation through accident, miscalculation or misunderstanding. Countries should treat each other with mutual respect and be willing to compete peacefully, letting performance be the ultimate judge. No country should claim infallibility and each country should be prepared to re-examine its own attitudes for the common good. The United States stressed that the peoples of Indochina should be allowed to determine their destiny without outside intervention; its constant primary objective has been a negotiated solution; the eight-point proposal put forward by the Republic of Vietnam and the United States on January 27, 1972 represents a basis for the attainment of that objective; in the absence of a negotiated settlement the United States envisages the ultimate withdrawal of all U.S. forces from the region consistent with the aim of self-determination for each country of Indochina. The United States will maintain its close ties with and support for the Republic of Korea; the United States will support efforts of the Republic of Korea to seek a relaxation of tension and increased communication in the Korean peninsula. The United States places the highest value on its friendly relations with Japan; it will continue to develop the existing close bonds. Consistent with the United Nations Security Council Resolution of December 21, 1971, the United States favors the continuation of the ceasefire between India and Pakistan and the withdrawal of all military forces to within their own territories and to their own sides of the ceasefire line in Jammu and Kashmir; the United States supports the right of the peoples of South Asia to shape their own future in peace, free of military threat, and without having the area become the subject of great power rivalry.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chinese side stated: Wherever there is oppression, there is resistance. Countries want independence, nations want liberation and the people want revolution—this has become the irresistible trend of history. All nations, big or small, should be equal; big nations should not bully the small and strong nations should not bully the weak. China will never be a superpower and it opposes hegemony and power politics of any kind. The Chinese side stated that it firmly supports the struggles of all the oppressed people and nations for freedom and liberation and that the people of all countries have the right to choose their social systems according to their own wishes and the right to safeguard the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of their own countries and oppose foreign aggression, interference, control and subversion. All foreign troops should be withdrawn to their own countries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chinese side expressed its firm support to the peoples of Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia in their efforts for the attainment of their&nbsp;<a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/pg_814">[Page 814]</a>goal and its firm support to the seven-point proposal of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam and the elaboration of February this year on the two key problems in the proposal, and to the Joint Declaration of the Summit Conference of the Indochinese Peoples. It firmly supports the eight-point program for the peaceful unification of Korea put forward by the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on April 12, 1971, and the stand for the abolition of the “U.N. Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea.” It firmly opposes the revival and outward expansion of Japanese militarism and firmly supports the Japanese people’s desire to build an independent, democratic, peaceful and neutral Japan. It firmly maintains that India and Pakistan should, in accordance with the United Nations resolutions on the India-Pakistan question, immediately withdraw all their forces to their respective territories and to their own sides of the ceasefire line in Jammu and Kashmir and firmly supports the Pakistan Government and people in their struggle to preserve their independence and sovereignty and the people of Jammu and Kashmir in their struggle for the right of self-determination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are essential differences between China and the United States in their social systems and foreign policies. However, the two sides agreed that countries, regardless of their social systems, should conduct their relations on the principles of respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states, nonaggression against other states, noninterference in the internal affairs of other states, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence. International disputes should be settled on this basis, without resorting to the use or threat of force. The United States and the People’s Republic of China are prepared to apply these principles to their mutual relations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With these principles of international relations in mind the two sides stated that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>—progress toward the normalization of relations between China and the United States is in the interests of all countries;</li><li>—both wish to reduce the danger of international military conflict;</li><li>—neither should seek hegemony in the Asia–Pacific region and each is opposed to efforts by any other country or group of countries to establish such hegemony; and</li><li>—neither is prepared to negotiate on behalf of any third party or to enter into agreements or understandings with the other directed at other states.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both sides are of the view that it would be against the interests of the peoples of the world for any major country to collude with another against other countries, or for major countries to divide up the world into spheres of interest.<a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/pg_815">[Page 815]</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The two sides reviewed the long-standing serious disputes between China and the United States. The Chinese side reaffirmed its position: The Taiwan question is the crucial question obstructing the normalization of relations between China and the United States; the Government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government of China; Taiwan is a province of China which has long been returned to the motherland; the liberation of Taiwan is China’s internal affair in which no other country has the right to interfere; and all U.S. forces and military installations must be withdrawn from Taiwan. The Chinese Government firmly opposes any activities which aim at the creation of “one China, one Taiwan,” “one China, two governments,” “two Chinas,” and “independent Taiwan” or advocate that “the status of Taiwan remains to be determined.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The U.S. side declared: The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States Government does not challenge that position. It reaffirms its interest in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves. With this prospect in mind, it affirms the ultimate objective of the withdrawal of all U.S. forces and military installations from Taiwan. In the meantime, it will progressively reduce its forces and military installations on Taiwan as the tension in the area diminishes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The two sides agreed that it is desirable to broaden the understanding between the two peoples. To this end, they discussed specific areas in such fields as science, technology, culture, sports and journalism, in which people-to-people contacts and exchanges would be mutually beneficial. Each side undertakes to facilitate the further development of such contacts and exchanges.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both sides view bilateral trade as another area from which mutual benefit can be derived, and agreed that economic relations based on equality and mutual benefit are in the interest of the people of the two countries. They agree to facilitate the progressive development of trade between their two countries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The two sides agreed that they will stay in contact through various channels, including the sending of a senior U.S. representative to Peking from time to time for concrete consultations to further the normalization of relations between the two countries and continue to exchange views on issues of common interest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The two sides expressed the hope that the gains achieved during this visit would open up new prospects for the relations between the two countries. They believe that the normalization of relations between the two countries is not only in the interest of the Chinese and American peoples but also contributes to the relaxation of tension in Asia and the world.<a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/pg_816">[Page 816]</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">President&nbsp;Nixon, Mrs.&nbsp;Nixon&nbsp;and the American party expressed their appreciation for the gracious hospitality shown them by the Government and people of the People’s Republic of China. *</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-css-opacity"/>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<p class="has-text-color wp-block-paragraph" style="color:#6a6b6f;font-size:12px">* A Note following the text of the communiqué reads: “The joint statement was released at Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. On the same day, the White House released a statement by Press Secretary&nbsp;Ronald L. Ziegler&nbsp;and the transcript of a news briefing on the joint statement. Participants in the news briefing were&nbsp;Henry A. Kissinger, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and&nbsp;Marshall Green, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs. The statement and the transcript are printed in the&nbsp;<em>Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents</em>&nbsp;(vol. 8, pp. 480 and 476).” On February 14, the White House released a statement by&nbsp;Ziegler&nbsp;on further relaxation of trade with the People’s Republic of China. The statement is printed in the&nbsp;<em>Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents</em>&nbsp;(vol. 8, p. 438). On February 21 the White House released a statement and transcript of a news briefing by&nbsp;Ziegler&nbsp;on the President’s meeting with Chairman&nbsp;Mao Tse-tung. The statement is ibid., p. 466.</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from Office of the Historian at State Department. You may find the original post <a href="https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/d203">HERE</a>.</h6>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/shanghai-communique/">Shanghai Communiqué (1972)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4490</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Peace Treaty (1951)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/san-francisco-peace-treaty-september-8-1951/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/san-francisco-peace-treaty-september-8-1951/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 1951 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Peace Treaty (1951)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The San Francisco Peace Treaty did not mention the beneficiary of Taiwan. It is because there is a controversy on the recipient of sovereignty -- the UK-recognized Communist in Beijing, or the US-recognized Kuomintang in Taipei at the moment.<br />
However, since the PRC was established, it has not exercised any control over Taiwan. The people of Taiwan are the only ones who have the right to claim sovereignty over Taiwan.<br />
The Treaty, therefore, provides the people of Taiwan with the legal basis for their right to self-determination.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/san-francisco-peace-treaty-september-8-1951/">San Francisco Peace Treaty (1951)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">No. 1832<br>ARGENTINA, AUSTRALIA, BELGIUM, BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, etc.</h6>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Treaty of Peace with Japan (with two declarations). </h4>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">Signed at San Francisco, on 8 September 1951<br>Official texts: English, French, Spanish and Japanese.<br>Registered by the United States of America on 21 August 1952</h6>



<hr class="wp-block-separator"/>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WHEREAS the Allied Powers and Japan are resolved that henceforth their relations shall be those of nations which, as sovereign equals, cooperate in friendly association to promote their common welfare and to maintain international peace and security, and are therefore desirous of concluding a Treaty of Peace which will settle questions still outstanding as a result of the existence of a state of war between them;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WHEREAS Japan for its part declares its intention to apply for membership in the United Nations and in all circumstances to conform to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations; to strive to realize the objectives of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; to seek to create within Japan conditions of stability and well-being as defined in Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations and already initiated by post-surrender Japanese legislation; and in public and private trade and commerce to conform to internationally accepted fair practices;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WHEREAS the Allied Powers welcome the intentions of Japan set out in the foregoing paragraph;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">THE ALLIED POWERS AND JAPAN have therefore determined to conclude the present Treaty of Peace, and have accordingly appointed the undersigned Plenipotentiaries, who, after presentation of their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed on the following provisions:</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER I</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">PEACE</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 1</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) The state of war between Japan and each of the Allied Powers is terminated as from the date on which the present Treaty comes into force between Japan and the Allied Power concerned as provided for in Article 23.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) The Allied Powers recognize the full sovereignty of the Japanese people over Japan and its territorial waters.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER II</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">TERRITORY</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 2</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan recognizing the independence of Korea, renounces all right, title and claim to Korea, including the islands of Quelpart, Port Hamilton and Dagelet.</p>



<p style="color:#1d6b98" class="has-text-color wp-block-paragraph"><strong>(b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Kurile Islands, and to that portion of Sakhalin and the islands adjacent to it over which Japan acquired sovereignty as a consequence of the Treaty of Portsmouth of 5 September 1905.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(d) Japan renounces all right, title and claim in connection with the League of Nations Mandate System, and accepts the action of the United Nations Security Council of 2 April 1947, extending the trusteeship system to the Pacific Islands formerly under mandate to Japan.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(e) Japan renounces all claim to any right or title to or interest in connection with any part of the Antarctic area, whether deriving from the activities of Japanese nationals or otherwise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(f) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to the Spratly Islands and to the Paracel Islands.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 3</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Japan will concur in any proposal of the United States to the United Nations to place under its trusteeship system, with the United States as the sole administering authority, Nansei Shoto south of 29deg. north latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands), Nanpo Shoto south of Sofu Gan (including the Bonin Islands, Rosario Island and the Volcano Islands) and Parece Vela and Marcus Island. Pending the making of such a proposal and affirmative action thereon, the United States will have the right to exercise all and any powers of administration, legislation and jurisdiction over the territory and inhabitants of these islands, including their territorial waters.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 4</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this Article, the disposition of property of Japan and of its nationals in the areas referred to in Article 2, and their claims, including debts, against the authorities presently administering such areas and the residents (including juridical persons) thereof, and the disposition in Japan of property of such authorities and residents, and of claims, including debts, of such authorities and residents against Japan and its nationals, shall be the subject of special arrangements between Japan and such authorities. The property of any of the Allied Powers or its nationals in the areas referred to in Article 2 shall, insofar as this has not already been done, be returned by the administering authority in the condition in which it now exists. (The term nationals whenever used in the present Treaty includes juridical persons.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Japan recognizes the validity of dispositions of property of Japan and Japanese nationals made by or pursuant to directives of the United States Military Government in any of the areas referred to in Articles 2 and 3.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) Japanese owned submarine cables connection Japan with territory removed from Japanese control pursuant to the present Treaty shall be equally divided, Japan retaining the Japanese terminal and adjoining half of the cable, and the detached territory the remainder of the cable and connecting terminal facilities.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER III</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">SECURITY</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 5</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan accepts the obligations set forth in Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular the obligations</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(i) to settle its international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(ii) to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(iii) to give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the Charter and to refrain from giving assistance to any State against which the United Nations may take preventive or enforcement action.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) The Allied Powers confirm that they will be guided by the principles of Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations in their relations with Japan.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) The Allied Powers for their part recognize that Japan as a sovereign nation possesses the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense referred to in &#8220;charter.htm&#8221; \l &#8220;51&#8221;Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations and that Japan may voluntarily enter into collective security arrangements.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 6</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) All occupation forces of the Allied Powers shall be withdrawn from Japan as soon as possible after the coming into force of the present Treaty, and in any case not later than 90 days thereafter. Nothing in this provision shall, however, prevent the stationing or retention of foreign armed forces in Japanese territory under or in consequence of any bilateral or multilateral agreements which have been or may be made between one or more of the Allied Powers, on the one hand, and Japan on the other.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) The provisions of Article 9 of the Potsdam Proclamation of 26 July 1945, dealing with the return of Japanese military forces to their homes, to the extent not already completed, will be carried out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) All Japanese property for which compensation has not already been paid, which was supplied for the use of the occupation forces and which remains in the possession of those forces at the time of the coming into force of the present Treaty, shall be returned to the Japanese Government within the same 90 days unless other arrangements are made by mutual agreement.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER IV</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CLAUSES</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 7</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Each of the Allied Powers, within one year after the present Treaty has come into force between it and Japan, will notify Japan which of its prewar bilateral treaties or conventions with Japan it wishes to continue in force or revive, and any treaties or conventions so notified shall continue in force or by revived subject only to such amendments as may be necessary to ensure conformity with the present Treaty. The treaties and conventions so notified shall be considered as having been continued in force or revived three months after the date of notification and shall be registered with the Secretariat of the United Nations. All such treaties and conventions as to which Japan is not so notified shall be regarded as abrogated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Any notification made under paragraph (a) of this Article may except from the operation or revival of a treaty or convention any territory for the international relations of which the notifying Power is responsible, until three months after the date on which notice is given to Japan that such exception shall cease to apply.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 8</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan will recognize the full force of all treaties now or hereafter concluded by the Allied Powers for terminating the state of war initiated on 1 September 1939, as well as any other arrangements by the Allied Powers for or in connection with the restoration of peace. Japan also accepts the arrangements made for terminating the former League of Nations and Permanent Court of International Justice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Japan renounces all such rights and interests as it may derive from being a signatory power of the Conventions of St. Germain-en-Laye of 10 September 1919, and the Straits Agreement of Montreux of 20 July 1936, and from Article 16 of the Treaty of Peace with Turkey signed at Lausanne on 24 July 1923.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) Japan renounces all rights, title and interests acquired under, and is discharged from all obligations resulting from, the Agreement between Germany and the Creditor Powers of 20 January 1930 and its Annexes, including the Trust Agreement, dated 17 May 1930, the Convention of 20 January 1930, respecting the Bank for International Settlements; and the Statutes of the Bank for International Settlements. Japan will notify to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Paris within six months of the first coming into force of the present Treaty its renunciation of the rights, title and interests referred to in this paragraph.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 9</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Japan will enter promptly into negotiations with the Allied Powers so desiring for the conclusion of bilateral and multilateral agreements providing for the regulation or limitation of fishing and the conservation and development of fisheries on the high seas.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 10</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Japan renounces all special rights and interests in China, including all benefits and privileges resulting from the provisions of the final Protocol signed at Peking on 7 September 1901, and all annexes, notes and documents supplementary thereto, and agrees to the abrogation in respect to Japan of the said protocol, annexes, notes and documents.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 11</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Japan accepts the judgments of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and of other Allied War Crimes Courts both within and outside Japan, and will carry out the sentences imposed thereby upon Japanese nationals imprisoned in Japan. The power to grant clemency, to reduce sentences and to parole with respect to such prisoners may not be exercised except on the decision of the Government or Governments which imposed the sentence in each instance, and on recommendation of Japan. In the case of persons sentenced by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, such power may not be exercised except on the decision of a majority of the Governments represented on the Tribunal, and on the recommendation of Japan.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 12</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan declares its readiness promptly to enter into negotiations for the conclusion with each of the Allied Powers of treaties or agreements to place their trading, maritime and other commercial relations on a stable and friendly basis.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Pending the conclusion of the relevant treaty or agreement, Japan will, during a period of four years from the first coming into force of the present Treaty</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(1) accord to each of the Allied Powers, its nationals, products and vessels</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(i) most-favoured-nation treatment with respect to customs duties, charges, restrictions and other regulations on or in connection with the importation and exportation of goods;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(ii) national treatment with respect to shipping, navigation and imported goods, and with respect to natural and juridical persons and their interests &#8211; such treatment to include all matters pertaining to the levying and collection of taxes, access to the courts, the making and performance of contracts, rights to property (tangible and intangible), participating in juridical entities constituted under Japanese law, and generally the conduct of all kinds of business and professional activities;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(2) ensure that external purchases and sales of Japanese state trading enterprises shall be based solely on commercial considerations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) In respect to any matter, however, Japan shall be obliged to accord to an Allied Power national treatment, or most-favored-nation treatment, only to the extent that the Allied Power concerned accords Japan national treatment or most-favored-nation treatment, as the case may be, in respect of the same matter. The reciprocity envisaged in the foregoing sentence shall be determined, in the case of products, vessels and juridical entities of, and persons domiciled in, any non-metropolitan territory of an Allied Power, and in the case of juridical entities of, and persons domiciled in, any state or province of an Allied Power having a federal government, by reference to the treatment accorded to Japan in such territory, state or province.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(d) In the application of this Article, a discriminatory measure shall not be considered to derogate from the grant of national or most-favored-nation treatment, as the case may be, if such measure is based on an exception customarily provided for in the commercial treaties of the party applying it, or on the need to safeguard that party&#8217;s external financial position or balance of payments (except in respect to shipping and navigation), or on the need to maintain its essential security interests, and provided such measure is proportionate to the circumstances and not applied in an arbitrary or unreasonable manner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(e) Japan&#8217;s obligations under this Article shall not be affected by the exercise of any Allied rights under Article 14 of the present Treaty; nor shall the provisions of this Article be understood as limiting the undertakings assumed by Japan by virtue of Article 15 of the Treaty.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 13</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan will enter into negotiations with any of the Allied Powers, promptly upon the request of such Power or Powers, for the conclusion of bilateral or multilateral agreements relating to international civil air transport.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Pending the conclusion of such agreement or agreements, Japan will, during a period of four years from the first coming into force of the present Treaty, extend to such Power treatment not less favorable with respect to air-traffic rights and privileges than those exercised by any such Powers at the date of such coming into force, and will accord complete equality of opportunity in respect to the operation and development of air services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) Pending its becoming a party to the Convention on International Civil Aviation in accordance with Article 93 thereof, Japan will give effect to the provisions of that Convention applicable to the international navigation of aircraft, and will give effect to the standards, practices and procedures adopted as annexes to the Convention in accordance with the terms of the Convention.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER V</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">CLAIMS AND PROPERTY</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 14</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) It is recognized that Japan should pay reparations to the Allied Powers for the damage and suffering caused by it during the war. Nevertheless it is also recognized that the resources of Japan are not presently sufficient, if it is to maintain a viable economy, to make complete reparation for all such damage and suffering and at the same time meet its other obligations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Therefore,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">1. Japan will promptly enter into negotiations with Allied Powers so desiring, whose present territories were occupied by Japanese forces and damaged by Japan, with a view to assisting to compensate those countries for the cost of repairing the damage done, by making available the services of the Japanese people in production, salvaging and other work for the Allied Powers in question. Such arrangements shall avoid the imposition of additional liabilities on other Allied Powers, and, where the manufacturing of raw materials is called for, they shall be supplied by the Allied Powers in question, so as not to throw any foreign exchange burden upon Japan.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">2. (I) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph (II) below, each of the Allied Powers shall have the right to seize, retain, liquidate or otherwise dispose of all property, rights and interests of</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan and Japanese nationals,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) persons acting for or on behalf of Japan or Japanese nationals, and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) entities owned or controlled by Japan or Japanese nationals, which on the first coming into force of the present Treaty were subject to its jurisdiction. The property, rights and interests specified in this subparagraph shall include those now blocked, vested or in the possession or under the control of enemy property authorities of Allied Powers, which belong to, or were held or managed on behalf of, any of the persons or entities mentioned in (a), (b) or (c) above at the time such assets came under the controls of such authorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(II) The following shall be excepted from the right specified in subparagraph (I) above:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(i) property of Japanese natural persons who during the war resided with the permission of the Government concerned in the territory of one of the Allied Powers, other than territory occupied by Japan, except property subjected to restrictions during the war and not released from such restrictions as of the date of the first coming into force of the present Treaty;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(ii) all real property, furniture and fixtures owned by the Government of Japan and used for diplomatic or consular purposes, and all personal furniture and furnishings and other private property not of an investment nature which was normally necessary for the carrying out of diplomatic and consular functions, owned by Japanese diplomatic and consular personnel;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(iii) property belonging to religious bodies or private charitable institutions and used exclusively for religious or charitable purposes;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(iv) property, rights and interests which have come within its jurisdiction in consequence of the resumption of trade and financial relations subsequent to 2 September 1945, between the country concerned and Japan, except such as have resulted from transactions contrary to the laws of the Allied Power concerned;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(v) obligations of Japan or Japanese nationals, any right, title or interest in tangible property located in Japan, interests in enterprises organized under the laws of Japan, or any paper evidence thereof; provided that this exception shall only apply to obligations of Japan and its nationals expressed in Japanese currency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(III) Property referred to in exceptions (i) through (v) above shall be returned subject to reasonable expenses for its preservation and administration. If any such property has been liquidated the proceeds shall be returned instead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(IV) The right to seize, retain, liquidate or otherwise dispose of property as provided in subparagraph (I) above shall be exercised in accordance with the laws of the Allied Power concerned, and the owner shall have only such rights as may be given him by those laws.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(V) The Allied Powers agree to deal with Japanese trademarks and literary and artistic property rights on a basis as favorable to Japan as circumstances ruling in each country will permit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Except as otherwise provided in the present Treaty, the Allied Powers waive all reparations claims of the Allied Powers, other claims of the Allied Powers and their nationals arising out of any actions taken by Japan and its nationals in the course of the prosecution of the war, and claims of the Allied Powers for direct military costs of occupation.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 15</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Upon application made within nine months of the coming into force of the present Treaty between Japan and the Allied Power concerned, Japan will, within six months of the date of such application, return the property, tangible and intangible, and all rights or interests of any kind in Japan of each Allied Power and its nationals which was within Japan at any time between 7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945, unless the owner has freely disposed thereof without duress or fraud. Such property shall be returned free of all encumbrances and charges to which it may have become subject because of the war, and without any charges for its return. Property whose return is not applied for by or on behalf of the owner or by his Government within the prescribed period may be disposed of by the Japanese Government as it may determine. In cases where such property was within Japan on 7 December 1941, and cannot be returned or has suffered injury or damage as a result of the war, compensation will be made on terms not less favorable than the terms provided in the draft Allied Powers Property Compensation Law approved by the Japanese Cabinet on 13 July 1951.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) With respect to industrial property rights impaired during the war, Japan will continue to accord to the Allied Powers and their nationals benefits no less than those heretofore accorded by Cabinet Orders No. 309 effective 1 September 1949, No. 12 effective 28 January 1950, and No. 9 effective 1 February 1950, all as now amended, provided such nationals have applied for such benefits within the time limits prescribed therein.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) (i) Japan acknowledges that the literary and artistic property rights which existed in Japan on 6 December 1941, in respect to the published and unpublished works of the Allied Powers and their nationals have continued in force since that date, and recognizes those rights which have arisen, or but for the war would have arisen, in Japan since that date, by the operation of any conventions and agreements to which Japan was a party on that date, irrespective of whether or not such conventions or agreements were abrogated or suspended upon or since the outbreak of war by the domestic law of Japan or of the Allied Power concerned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(ii) Without the need for application by the proprietor of the right and without the payment of any fee or compliance with any other formality, the period from 7 December 1941 until the coming into force of the present Treaty between Japan and the Allied Power concerned shall be excluded from the running of the normal term of such rights; and such period, with an additional period of six months, shall be excluded from the time within which a literary work must be translated into Japanese in order to obtain translating rights in Japan.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 16</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As an expression of its desire to indemnify those members of the armed forces of the Allied Powers who suffered undue hardships while prisoners of war of Japan, Japan will transfer its assets and those of its nationals in countries which were neutral during the war, or which were at war with any of the Allied Powers, or, at its option, the equivalent of such assets, to the International Committee of the Red Cross which shall liquidate such assets and distribute the resultant fund to appropriate national agencies, for the benefit of former prisoners of war and their families on such basis as it may determine to be equitable. The categories of assets described in Article 14(a)2(II)(ii) through (v) of the present Treaty shall be excepted from transfer, as well as assets of Japanese natural persons not residents of Japan on the first coming into force of the Treaty. It is equally understood that the transfer provision of this Article has no application to the 19,770 shares in the Bank for International Settlements presently owned by Japanese financial institutions.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 17</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Upon the request of any of the Allied Powers, the Japanese Government shall review and revise in conformity with international law any decision or order of the Japanese Prize Courts in cases involving ownership rights of nationals of that Allied Power and shall supply copies of all documents comprising the records of these cases, including the decisions taken and orders issued. In any case in which such review or revision shows that restoration is due, the provisions of Article 15 shall apply to the property concerned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) The Japanese Government shall take the necessary measures to enable nationals of any of the Allied Powers at any time within one year from the coming into force of the present Treaty between Japan and the Allied Power concerned to submit to the appropriate Japanese authorities for review any judgment given by a Japanese court between 7 December 1941 and such coming into force, in any proceedings in which any such national was unable to make adequate presentation of his case either as plaintiff or defendant. The Japanese Government shall provide that, where the national has suffered injury by reason of any such judgment, he shall be restored in the position in which he was before the judgment was given or shall be afforded such relief as may be just and equitable in the circumstances.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 18</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) It is recognized that the intervention of the state of war has not affected the obligation to pay pecuniary debts arising out of obligations and contracts (including those in respect of bonds) which existed and rights which were acquired before the existence of a state of war, and which are due by the Government or nationals of Japan to the Government or nationals of one of the Allied Powers, or are due by the Government or nationals of one of the Allied Powers to the Government or nationals of Japan. The intervention of a state of war shall equally not be regarded as affecting the obligation to consider on their merits claims for loss or damage to property or for personal injury or death which arose before the existence of a state of war, and which may be presented or re-presented by the Government of one of the Allied Powers to the Government of Japan, or by the Government of Japan to any of the Governments of the Allied Powers. The provisions of this paragraph are without prejudice to the rights conferred by Article 14.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) Japan affirms its liability for the prewar external debt of the Japanese State and for debts of corporate bodies subsequently declared to be liabilities of the Japanese State, and expresses its intention to enter into negotiations at an early date with its creditors with respect to the resumption of payments on those debts; to encourage negotiations in respect to other prewar claims and obligations; and to facilitate the transfer of sums accordingly.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 19</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) Japan waives all claims of Japan and its nationals against the Allied Powers and their nationals arising out of the war or out of actions taken because of the existence of a state of war, and waives all claims arising from the presence, operations or actions of forces or authorities of any of the Allied Powers in Japanese territory prior to the coming into force of the present Treaty.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) The foregoing waiver includes any claims arising out of actions taken by any of the Allied Powers with respect to Japanese ships between 1 September 1939 and the coming into force of the present Treaty, as well as any claims and debts arising in respect to Japanese prisoners of war and civilian internees in the hands of the Allied Powers, but does not include Japanese claims specifically recognized in the laws of any Allied Power enacted since 2 September 1945.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(c) Subject to reciprocal renunciation, the Japanese Government also renounces all claims (including debts) against Germany and German nationals on behalf of the Japanese Government and Japanese nationals, including intergovernmental claims and claims for loss or damage sustained during the war, but excepting (a) claims in respect of contracts entered into and rights acquired before 1 September 1939, and (b) claims arising out of trade and financial relations between Japan and Germany after 2 September 1945. Such renunciation shall not prejudice actions taken in accordance with Articles 16 and 20 of the present Treaty.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(d) Japan recognizes the validity of all acts and omissions done during the period of occupation under or in consequence of directives of the occupation authorities or authorized by Japanese law at that time, and will take no action subjecting Allied nationals to civil or criminal liability arising out of such acts or omissions.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 20</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Japan will take all necessary measures to ensure such disposition of German assets in Japan as has been or may be determined by those powers entitled under the Protocol of the proceedings of the Berlin Conference of 1945 to dispose of those assets, and pending the final disposition of such assets will be responsible for the conservation and administration thereof.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 21</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 25 of the present Treaty, China shall be entitled to the benefits of Articles 10 and 14(a)2; and Korea to the benefits of Articles 2, 4, 9 and 12 of the present Treaty.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER VI</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 22</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If in the opinion of any Party to the present Treaty there has arisen a dispute concerning the interpretation or execution of the Treaty, which is not settled by reference to a special claims tribunal or by other agreed means, the dispute shall, at the request of any party thereto, be referred for decision to the International Court of Justice. Japan and those Allied Powers which are not already parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice will deposit with the Registrar of the Court, at the time of their respective ratifications of the present Treaty, and in conformity with the resolution of the United Nations Security Council, dated 15 October 1946, a general declaration accepting the jurisdiction, without special agreement, of the Court generally in respect to all disputes of the character referred to in this Article.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center wp-block-heading">CHAPTER VII</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">FINAL CLAUSES</h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 23</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(a) The present Treaty shall be ratified by the States which sign it, including Japan, and will come into force for all the States which have then ratified it, when instruments of ratification have been deposited by Japan and by a majority, including the United States of America as the principal occupying Power, of the following States, namely Australia, Canada, Ceylon, France, Indonesia, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Republic of the Philippines, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America. The present Treaty shall come into force of each State which subsequently ratifies it, on the date of the deposit of its instrument of ratification.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(b) If the Treaty has not come into force within nine months after the date of the deposit of Japan&#8217;s ratification, any State which has ratified it may bring the Treaty into force between itself and Japan by a notification to that effect given to the Governments of Japan and the United States of America not later than three years after the date of deposit of Japan&#8217;s ratification.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 24</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America which will notify all the signatory States of each such deposit, of the date of the coming into force of the Treaty under paragraph (a) of Article 23, and of any notifications made under paragraph (b) of Article 23.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 25</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the purposes of the present Treaty the Allied Powers shall be the States at war with Japan, or any State which previously formed a part of the territory of a State named in Article 23, provided that in each case the State concerned has signed and ratified the Treaty. Subject to the provisions of Article 21, the present Treaty shall not confer any rights, titles or benefits on any State which is not an Allied Power as herein defined; nor shall any right, title or interest of Japan be deemed to be diminished or prejudiced by any provision of the Treaty in favour of a State which is not an Allied Power as so defined.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 26</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Japan will be prepared to conclude with any State which signed or adhered to the United Nations Declaration of 1 January 1942, and which is at war with Japan, or with any State which previously formed a part of the territory of a State named in Article 23, which is not a signatory of the present Treaty, a bilateral Treaty of Peace on the same or substantially the same terms as are provided for in the present Treaty, but this obligation on the part of Japan will expire three years after the first coming into force of the present Treaty. Should Japan make a peace settlement or war claims settlement with any State granting that State greater advantages than those provided by the present Treaty, those same advantages shall be extended to the parties to the present Treaty.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 27</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The present Treaty shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America which shall furnish each signatory State with a certified copy thereof.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>IN FAITH WHEREOF the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed the present Treaty.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>DONE at the city of San Francisco this eighth day of September 1951, in the English, French, and Spanish languages, all being equally authentic, and in the Japanese language.</strong></p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from the <a href="https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20136/volume-136-I-1832-English.pdf">original document</a> in UN&#8217;s website.  </h6>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/san-francisco-peace-treaty-september-8-1951/">San Francisco Peace Treaty (1951)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/san-francisco-peace-treaty-september-8-1951/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4482</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charter of the United Nations (1945)</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/charter-of-the-united-nations/</link>
					<comments>https://fapa.org/charter-of-the-united-nations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chih-yun Huang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 1945 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter of the United Nations (1945)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/?p=4477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Article 1(2) of the Charter of the United Nations states: The purposes of the United Nations are: "To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples….."<br />
It provides the people of Taiwan with the legal basis for their right of self-determination. Their quest for self-determination is guaranteed by international treaties such as the UN Charter.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/charter-of-the-united-nations/">Charter of the United Nations (1945)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and</li><li>to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and</li><li>to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and</li><li>to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,</li></ul>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">AND FOR THESE ENDS</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and</li><li>to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and</li><li>to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and</li><li>to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,</li></ul>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS</h4>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER I: PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Article 1</strong></h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Purposes of the United Nations are:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;</li><li><strong>To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace</strong>;</li><li>To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and</li><li>To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Article 2</strong></h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.</li><li>All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.</li><li>All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.</li><li>All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.</li><li>All Members shall give the United Nations every assistance in any action it takes in accordance with the present Charter, and shall refrain from giving assistance to any state against which the United Nations is taking preventive or enforcement action.</li><li>The Organization shall ensure that states which are not Members of the United Nations act in accordance with these Principles so far as may be necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security.</li><li>Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER II: MEMBERSHIP</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Article 3</strong></h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The original Members of the United Nations shall be the states which, having participated in the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco, or having previously signed the Declaration by United Nations of 1 January 1942, sign the present Charter and ratify it in accordance with Article 110.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Article 4</strong></h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.</li><li>The admission of any such state to membership in the United Nations will be effected by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 5</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Member of the United Nations against which preventive or enforcement action has been taken by the Security Council may be suspended from the exercise of the rights and privileges of membership by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. The exercise of these rights and privileges may be restored by the Security Council.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 6</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Member of the United Nations which has persistently violated the Principles contained in the present Charter may be expelled from the Organization by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER III: ORGANS</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 7</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>There are established as principal organs of the United Nations: a General Assembly, a Security Council, an Economic and Social Council, a Trusteeship Council, an International Court of Justice and a Secretariat.</li><li>Such subsidiary organs as may be found necessary may be established in accordance with the present Charter.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Article 8</h6>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER IV: THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>COMPOSITION</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 9</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The General Assembly shall consist of all the Members of the United Nations.</li><li>Each Member shall have not more than five representatives in the General Assembly.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>FUNCTIONS and POWERS</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 10</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter or relating to the powers and functions of any organs provided for in the present Charter, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations to the Members of the United Nations or to the Security Council or to both on any such questions or matters.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 11</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The General Assembly may consider the general principles of co-operation in the maintenance of international peace and security, including the principles governing disarmament and the regulation of armaments, and may make recommendations with regard to such principles to the Members or to the Security Council or to both.</li><li>The General Assembly may discuss any questions relating to the maintenance of international peace and security brought before it by any Member of the United Nations, or by the Security Council, or by a state which is not a Member of the United Nations in accordance with Article 35, paragraph 2, and, except as provided in Article 12, may make recommendations with regard to any such questions to the state or states concerned or to the Security Council or to both. Any such question on which action is necessary shall be referred to the Security Council by the General Assembly either before or after discussion.</li><li>The General Assembly may call the attention of the Security Council to situations which are likely to endanger international peace and security.</li><li>The powers of the General Assembly set forth in this Article shall not limit the general scope of Article 10.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 12</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>While the Security Council is exercising in respect of any dispute or situation the functions assigned to it in the present Charter, the General Assembly shall not make any recommendation with regard to that dispute or situation unless the Security Council so requests.</li><li>The Secretary-General, with the consent of the Security Council, shall notify the General Assembly at each session of any matters relative to the maintenance of international peace and security which are being dealt with by the Security Council and shall similarly notify the General Assembly, or the Members of the United Nations if the General Assembly is not in session, immediately the Security Council ceases to deal with such matters.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 13</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The General Assembly shall initiate studies and make recommendations for the purpose of:<ol><li>promoting international co-operation in the political field and encouraging the progressive development of international law and its codification;</li><li>promoting international co-operation in the economic, social, cultural, educational, and health fields, and assisting in the realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.</li><li>The further responsibilities, functions and powers of the General Assembly with respect to matters mentioned in paragraph 1 (b) above are set forth in Chapters IX and X.</li></ol></li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 14</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Subject to the provisions of Article 12, the General Assembly may recommend measures for the peaceful adjustment of any situation, regardless of origin, which it deems likely to impair the general welfare or friendly relations among nations, including situations resulting from a violation of the provisions of the present Charter setting forth the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 15</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The General Assembly shall receive and consider annual and special reports from the Security Council; these reports shall include an account of the measures that the Security Council has decided upon or taken to maintain international peace and security.</li><li>The General Assembly shall receive and consider reports from the other organs of the United Nations.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 16</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The General Assembly shall perform such functions with respect to the international trusteeship system as are assigned to it under Chapters XII and XIII, including the approval of the trusteeship agreements for areas not designated as strategic.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 17</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The General Assembly shall consider and approve the budget of the Organization.</li><li>The expenses of the Organization shall be borne by the Members as apportioned by the General Assembly.</li><li>The General Assembly shall consider and approve any financial and budgetary arrangements with specialized agencies referred to in Article 57 and shall examine the administrative budgets of such specialized agencies with a view to making recommendations to the agencies concerned.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>VOTING</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 18</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Each member of the General Assembly shall have one vote.</li><li>Decisions of the General Assembly on important questions shall be made by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. These questions shall include: recommendations with respect to the maintenance of international peace and security, the election of the non-permanent members of the Security Council, the election of the members of the Economic and Social Council, the election of members of the Trusteeship Council in accordance with paragraph 1 (c) of Article 86, the admission of new Members to the United Nations, the suspension of the rights and privileges of membership, the expulsion of Members, questions relating to the operation of the trusteeship system, and budgetary questions.</li><li>Decisions on other questions, including the determination of additional categories of questions to be decided by a two-thirds majority, shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 19</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Member of the United Nations which is in arrears in the payment of its financial contributions to the Organization shall have no vote in the General Assembly if the amount of its arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two full years. The General Assembly may, nevertheless, permit such a Member to vote if it is satisfied that the failure to pay is due to conditions beyond the control of the Member.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>PROCEDURE</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 20</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The General Assembly shall meet in regular annual sessions and in such special sessions as occasion may require. Special sessions shall be convoked by the Secretary-General at the request of the Security Council or of a majority of the Members of the United Nations.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 21</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The General Assembly shall adopt its own rules of procedure. It shall elect its President for each session.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 22</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The General Assembly may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER V: THE SECURITY COUNCIL</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>COMPOSITION</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 23</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Security Council shall consist of fifteen Members of the United Nations. The Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America shall be permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.</li><li>The non-permanent members of the Security Council shall be elected for a term of two years. In the first election of the non-permanent members after the increase of the membership of the Security Council from eleven to fifteen, two of the four additional members shall be chosen for a term of one year. A retiring member shall not be eligible for immediate re-election.</li><li>Each member of the Security Council shall have one representative.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>FUNCTIONS and POWERS</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 24</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members confer on the Security Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, and agree that in carrying out its duties under this responsibility the Security Council acts on their behalf.</li><li>In discharging these duties the Security Council shall act in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations. The specific powers granted to the Security Council for the discharge of these duties are laid down in Chapters VI, VII, VIII, and XII.</li><li>The Security Council shall submit annual and, when necessary, special reports to the General Assembly for its consideration.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 25</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 26</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to promote the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security with the least diversion for armaments of the world&#8217;s human and economic resources, the Security Council shall be responsible for formulating, with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee referred to in Article 47, plans to be submitted to the Members of the United Nations for the establishment of a system for the regulation of armaments.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>VOTING</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 27</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Each member of the Security Council shall have one vote.</li><li>Decisions of the Security Council on procedural matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members.</li><li>Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>PROCEDURE</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 28</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Security Council shall be so organized as to be able to function continuously. Each member of the Security Council shall for this purpose be represented at all times at the seat of the Organization.</li><li>The Security Council shall hold periodic meetings at which each of its members may, if it so desires, be represented by a member of the government or by some other specially designated representative.</li><li>The Security Council may hold meetings at such places other than the seat of the Organization as in its judgment will best facilitate its work.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 29</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Security Council may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 30</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Security Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 31</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Any Member of the United Nations which is not a member of the Security Council may participate, without vote, in the discussion of any question brought before the Security Council whenever the latter considers that the interests of that Member are specially affected.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 32</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Any Member of the United Nations which is not a member of the Security Council or any state which is not a Member of the United Nations, if it is a party to a dispute under consideration by the Security Council, shall be invited to participate, without vote, in the discussion relating to the dispute. The Security Council shall lay down such conditions as it deems just for the participation of a state which is not a Member of the United Nations.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER VI: PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 33</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.</li><li>The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the parties to settle their dispute by such means.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 34</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Security Council may investigate any dispute, or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute, in order to determine whether the continuance of the dispute or situation is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 35</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Any Member of the United Nations may bring any dispute, or any situation of the nature referred to in Article 34, to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly.</li><li>A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may bring to the attention of the Security Council or of the General Assembly any dispute to which it is a party if it accepts in advance, for the purposes of the dispute, the obligations of pacific settlement provided in the present Charter.</li><li>The proceedings of the General Assembly in respect of matters brought to its attention under this Article will be subject to the provisions of Articles 11 and 12.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 36</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Security Council may, at any stage of a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 or of a situation of like nature, recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment.</li><li>The Security Council should take into consideration any procedures for the settlement of the dispute which have already been adopted by the parties.</li><li>In making recommendations under this Article the Security Council should also take into consideration that legal disputes should as a general rule be referred by the parties to the International Court of Justice in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Court.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 37</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Should the parties to a dispute of the nature referred to in Article 33 fail to settle it by the means indicated in that Article, they shall refer it to the Security Council.</li><li>If the Security Council deems that the continuance of the dispute is in fact likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, it shall decide whether to take action under Article 36 or to recommend such terms of settlement as it may consider appropriate.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 38</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 33 to 37, the Security Council may, if all the parties to any dispute so request, make recommendations to the parties with a view to a pacific settlement of the dispute.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER VII: ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 39</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 40</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to prevent an aggravation of the situation, the Security Council may, before making the recommendations or deciding upon the measures provided for in Article 39, call upon the parties concerned to comply with such provisional measures as it deems necessary or desirable. Such provisional measures shall be without prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned. The Security Council shall duly take account of failure to comply with such provisional measures.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 41</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 42</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 43</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.</li><li>Such agreement or agreements shall govern the numbers and types of forces, their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of the facilities and assistance to be provided.</li><li>The agreement or agreements shall be negotiated as soon as possible on the initiative of the Security Council. They shall be concluded between the Security Council and Members or between the Security Council and groups of Members and shall be subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 44</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the Security Council has decided to use force it shall, before calling upon a Member not represented on it to provide armed forces in fulfilment of the obligations assumed under Article 43, invite that Member, if the Member so desires, to participate in the decisions of the Security Council concerning the employment of contingents of that Member&#8217;s armed forces.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 45</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In order to enable the United Nations to take urgent military measures, Members shall hold immediately available national air-force contingents for combined international enforcement action. The strength and degree of readiness of these contingents and plans for their combined action shall be determined within the limits laid down in the special agreement or agreements referred to in Article 43, by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 46</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Plans for the application of armed force shall be made by the Security Council with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 47</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>There shall be established a Military Staff Committee to advise and assist the Security Council on all questions relating to the Security Council&#8217;s military requirements for the maintenance of international peace and security, the employment and command of forces placed at its disposal, the regulation of armaments, and possible disarmament.</li><li>The Military Staff Committee shall consist of the Chiefs of Staff of the permanent members of the Security Council or their representatives. Any Member of the United Nations not permanently represented on the Committee shall be invited by the Committee to be associated with it when the efficient discharge of the Committee&#8217;s responsibilities requires the participation of that Member in its work.</li><li>The Military Staff Committee shall be responsible under the Security Council for the strategic direction of any armed forces placed at the disposal of the Security Council. Questions relating to the command of such forces shall be worked out subsequently.</li><li>The Military Staff Committee, with the authorization of the Security Council and after consultation with appropriate regional agencies, may establish regional sub-committees.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 48</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The action required to carry out the decisions of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security shall be taken by all the Members of the United Nations or by some of them, as the Security Council may determine.</li><li>Such decisions shall be carried out by the Members of the United Nations directly and through their action in the appropriate international agencies of which they are members.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 49</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Members of the United Nations shall join in affording mutual assistance in carrying out the measures decided upon by the Security Council.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 50</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If preventive or enforcement measures against any state are taken by the Security Council, any other state, whether a Member of the United Nations or not, which finds itself confronted with special economic problems arising from the carrying out of those measures shall have the right to consult the Security Council with regard to a solution of those problems.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 51</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER VIII: REGIONAL ARRANGEMENTS</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 52</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Nothing in the present Charter precludes the existence of regional arrangements or agencies for dealing with such matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security as are appropriate for regional action provided that such arrangements or agencies and their activities are consistent with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations.</li><li>The Members of the United Nations entering into such arrangements or constituting such agencies shall make every effort to achieve pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies before referring them to the Security Council.</li><li>The Security Council shall encourage the development of pacific settlement of local disputes through such regional arrangements or by such regional agencies either on the initiative of the states concerned or by reference from the Security Council.</li><li>This Article in no way impairs the application of Articles 34 and 35.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 53</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state, as defined in paragraph 2 of this Article, provided for pursuant to Article 107 or in regional arrangements directed against renewal of aggressive policy on the part of any such state, until such time as the Organization may, on request of the Governments concerned, be charged with the responsibility for preventing further aggression by such a state.</li><li>The term enemy state as used in paragraph 1 of this Article applies to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 54</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Security Council shall at all times be kept fully informed of activities undertaken or in contemplation under regional arrangements or by regional agencies for the maintenance of international peace and security.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER IX: INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CO-OPERATION</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 55</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being which are necessary for peaceful and friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, the United Nations shall promote:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;a.&nbsp;</strong>higher standards of living, full employment, and conditions of economic and social progress and development;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>b.</strong>&nbsp;solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems; and international cultural and educational &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cooperation; and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;c.</strong>&nbsp;universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, &nbsp; &nbsp;language, or religion.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 56</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in co-operation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 57</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The various specialized agencies, established by intergovernmental agreement and having wide international responsibilities, as defined in their basic instruments, in economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related fields, shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations in accordance with the provisions of Article 63.</li><li>Such agencies thus brought into relationship with the United Nations are hereinafter referred to as specialized agencies.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 58</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Organization shall make recommendations for the co-ordination of the policies and activities of the specialized agencies.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 59</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Organization shall, where appropriate, initiate negotiations among the states concerned for the creation of any new specialized agencies required for the accomplishment of the purposes set forth in Article 55.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 60</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Responsibility for the discharge of the functions of the Organization set forth in this Chapter shall be vested in the General Assembly and, under the authority of the General Assembly, in the Economic and Social Council, which shall have for this purpose the powers set forth in Chapter X.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER X: THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>COMPOSITION</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 61</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Economic and Social Council shall consist of fifty-four Members of the United Nations elected by the General Assembly.</li><li>Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3, eighteen members of the Economic and Social Council shall be elected each year for a term of three years. A retiring member shall be eligible for immediate re-election.</li><li>At the first election after the increase in the membership of the Economic and Social Council from twenty-seven to fifty-four members, in addition to the members elected in place of the nine members whose term of office expires at the end of that year, twenty-seven additional members shall be elected. Of these twenty-seven additional members, the term of office of nine members so elected shall expire at the end of one year, and of nine other members at the end of two years, in accordance with arrangements made by the General Assembly.</li><li>Each member of the Economic and Social Council shall have one representative.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>FUNCTIONS and POWERS</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 62</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Economic and Social Council may make or initiate studies and reports with respect to international economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related matters and may make recommendations with respect to any such matters to the General Assembly to the Members of the United Nations, and to the specialized agencies concerned.</li><li>It may make recommendations for the purpose of promoting respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all.</li><li>It may prepare draft conventions for submission to the General Assembly, with respect to matters falling within its competence.</li><li>It may call, in accordance with the rules prescribed by the United Nations, international conferences on matters falling within its competence.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 63</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Economic and Social Council may enter into agreements with any of the agencies referred to in Article 57, defining the terms on which the agency concerned shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations. Such agreements shall be subject to approval by the General Assembly.</li><li>It may co-ordinate the activities of the specialized agencies through consultation with and recommendations to such agencies and through recommendations to the General Assembly and to the Members of the United Nations.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 64</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Economic and Social Council may take appropriate steps to obtain regular reports from the specialized agencies. It may make arrangements with the Members of the United Nations and with the specialized agencies to obtain reports on the steps taken to give effect to its own recommendations and to recommendations on matters falling within its competence made by the General Assembly.</li><li>It may communicate its observations on these reports to the General Assembly.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 65</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Economic and Social Council may furnish information to the Security Council and shall assist the Security Council upon its request.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 66</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Economic and Social Council shall perform such functions as fall within its competence in connection with the carrying out of the recommendations of the General Assembly.</li><li>It may, with the approval of the General Assembly, perform services at the request of Members of the United Nations and at the request of specialized agencies.</li><li>It shall perform such other functions as are specified elsewhere in the present Charter or as may be assigned to it by the General Assembly.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>VOTING</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 67</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Each member of the Economic and Social Council shall have one vote.</li><li>Decisions of the Economic and Social Council shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>PROCEDURE</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 68</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Economic and Social Council shall set up commissions in economic and social fields and for the promotion of human rights, and such other commissions as may be required for the performance of its functions.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 69</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Economic and Social Council shall invite any Member of the United Nations to participate, without vote, in its deliberations on any matter of particular concern to that Member.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 70</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Economic and Social Council may make arrangements for representatives of the specialized agencies to participate, without vote, in its deliberations and in those of the commissions established by it, and for its representatives to participate in the deliberations of the specialized agencies.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 71</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Economic and Social Council may make suitable arrangements for consultation with non-governmental organizations which are concerned with matters within its competence. Such arrangements may be made with international organizations and, where appropriate, with national organizations after consultation with the Member of the United Nations concerned.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 72</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Economic and Social Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.</li><li>The Economic and Social Council shall meet as required in accordance with its rules, which shall include provision for the convening of meetings on the request of a majority of its members.</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XI: DECLARATION REGARDING NON-SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 73</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government recognize the principle that the interests of the inhabitants of these territories are paramount, and accept as a sacred trust the obligation to promote to the utmost, within the system of international peace and security established by the present Charter, the well-being of the inhabitants of these territories, and, to this end:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>&nbsp; a.</strong>&nbsp;to ensure, with due respect for the culture of the peoples concerned, their political, economic, social, and educational advancement, their just treatment, and their protection against abuses;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>&nbsp; b.&nbsp;</strong>to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions, according to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and their varying stages of advancement;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>&nbsp; c.</strong>&nbsp;to further international peace and security;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>&nbsp; d.</strong>&nbsp;to promote constructive measures of development, to encourage research, and to co-operate with one another and, when and where appropriate, with specialized international bodies with a view to the practical achievement of the social, economic, and scientific purposes set forth in this Article; and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>e.</strong>&nbsp;to transmit regularly to the Secretary-General for information purposes, subject to such limitation as security and constitutional considerations may require, statistical and other information of a technical nature relating to economic, social, and educational conditions in the territories for which they are respectively responsible other than those territories to which Chapters XII and XIII apply.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 74</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Members of the United Nations also agree that their policy in respect of the territories to which this Chapter applies, no less than in respect of their metropolitan areas, must be based on the general principle of good-neighbourliness, due account being taken of the interests and well-being of the rest of the world, in social, economic, and commercial matters.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XII: INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEESHIP SYSTEM</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 75</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The United Nations shall establish under its authority an international trusteeship system for the administration and supervision of such territories as may be placed thereunder by subsequent individual agreements. These territories are hereinafter referred to as trust territories.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 76</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The basic objectives of the trusteeship system, in accordance with the Purposes of the United Nations laid down in Article 1 of the present Charter, shall be:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>a.</strong>&nbsp;to further international peace and security;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>b.</strong>&nbsp;to promote the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of the trust territories, and their progressive development towards self-government or independence as may be appropriate to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned, and as may be provided by the terms of each trusteeship agreement;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>c.</strong>&nbsp;to encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion, and to encourage recognition of the interdependence of the peoples of the world; and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>d.</strong>&nbsp;to ensure equal treatment in social, economic, and commercial matters for all Members of the United Nations and their nationals, and also equal treatment for the latter in the administration of justice, without prejudice to the attainment of the foregoing objectives and subject to the provisions of Article 80.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 77</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>1</strong>&nbsp;The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories in the following categories as may be placed thereunder by means of trusteeship agreements:&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;a.</strong>&nbsp;territories now held under mandate;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>b.</strong>&nbsp;territories which may be detached from enemy states as a result of the Second World War; and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>c.</strong>&nbsp;territories voluntarily placed under the system by states responsible for their administration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>2</strong>&nbsp;It will be a matter for subsequent agreement as to which territories in the foregoing categories will be brought under the trusteeship system and upon what terms.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 78</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The trusteeship system shall not apply to territories which have become Members of the United Nations, relationship among which shall be based on respect for the principle of sovereign equality.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 79</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The terms of trusteeship for each territory to be placed under the trusteeship system, including any alteration or amendment, shall be agreed upon by the states directly concerned, including the mandatory power in the case of territories held under mandate by a Member of the United Nations, and shall be approved as provided for in Articles 83 and 85.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 80</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Except as may be agreed upon in individual trusteeship agreements, made under Articles 77, 79, and 81, placing each territory under the trusteeship system, and until such agreements have been concluded, nothing in this Chapter shall be construed in or of itself to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments to which Members of the United Nations may respectively be parties.</li><li>Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be interpreted as giving grounds for delay or postponement of the negotiation and conclusion of agreements for placing mandated and other territories under the trusteeship system as provided for in Article 77.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 81</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The trusteeship agreement shall in each case include the terms under which the trust territory will be administered and designate the authority which will exercise the administration of the trust territory. Such authority, hereinafter called the administering authority, may be one or more states or the Organization itself.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 82</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There may be designated, in any trusteeship agreement, a strategic area or areas which may include part or all of the trust territory to which the agreement applies, without prejudice to any special agreement or agreements made under Article 43.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 83</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>All functions of the United Nations relating to strategic areas, including the approval of the terms of the trusteeship agreements and of their alteration or amendment shall be exercised by the Security Council.</li><li>The basic objectives set forth in Article 76 shall be applicable to the people of each strategic area.</li><li>The Security Council shall, subject to the provisions of the trusteeship agreements and without prejudice to security considerations, avail itself of the assistance of the Trusteeship Council to perform those functions of the United Nations under the trusteeship system relating to political, economic, social, and educational matters in the strategic areas.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 84</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It shall be the duty of the administering authority to ensure that the trust territory shall play its part in the maintenance of international peace and security. To this end the administering authority may make use of volunteer forces, facilities, and assistance from the trust territory in carrying out the obligations towards the Security Council undertaken in this regard by the administering authority, as well as for local defence and the maintenance of law and order within the trust territory.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 85</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The functions of the United Nations with regard to trusteeship agreements for all areas not designated as strategic, including the approval of the terms of the trusteeship agreements and of their alteration or amendment, shall be exercised by the General Assembly.</li><li>The Trusteeship Council, operating under the authority of the General Assembly shall assist the General Assembly in carrying out these functions.</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XIII: THE TRUSTEESHIP COUNCIL</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>COMPOSITION</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 86</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>1</strong>&nbsp;The Trusteeship Council shall consist of the following Members of the United Nations:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>a.</strong>&nbsp;those Members administering trust territories;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>b.</strong>&nbsp;such of those Members mentioned by name in Article 23 as are not administering trust territories; and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>c.</strong>&nbsp;as many other Members elected for three-year terms by the General Assembly as may be necessary to ensure that the total number of members of the Trusteeship Council is equally divided between those Members of the United Nations which administer trust territories and those which do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;2</strong>&nbsp;Each member of the Trusteeship Council shall designate one specially qualified person to represent it therein.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>FUNCTIONS and POWERS</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 87</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The General Assembly and, under its authority, the Trusteeship Council, in carrying out their functions, may:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>a.</strong>&nbsp;consider reports submitted by the administering authority;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>b.</strong>&nbsp;accept petitions and examine them in consultation with the administering authority;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>c.</strong>&nbsp;provide for periodic visits to the respective trust territories at times agreed upon with the administering authority; and</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>d.</strong>&nbsp;take these and other actions in conformity with the terms of the trusteeship agreements.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 88</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Trusteeship Council shall formulate a questionnaire on the political, economic, social, and educational advancement of the inhabitants of each trust territory, and the administering authority for each trust territory within the competence of the General Assembly shall make an annual report to the General Assembly upon the basis of such questionnaire.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>VOTING</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 89</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Each member of the Trusteeship Council shall have one vote.</li><li>Decisions of the Trusteeship Council shall be made by a majority of the members present and voting.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>PROCEDURE</strong></h6>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 90</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Trusteeship Council shall adopt its own rules of procedure, including the method of selecting its President.</li><li>The Trusteeship Council shall meet as required in accordance with its rules, which shall include provision for the convening of meetings on the request of a majority of its members.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 91</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Trusteeship Council shall, when appropriate, avail itself of the assistance of the Economic and Social Council and of the specialized agencies in regard to matters with which they are respectively concerned.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XIV: THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 92</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Court of Justice shall be the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It shall function in accordance with the annexed Statute, which is based upon the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice and forms an integral part of the present Charter.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 93</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>All Members of the United Nations are&nbsp;ipso facto&nbsp;parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice.</li><li>A state which is not a Member of the United Nations may become a party to the Statute of the International Court of Justice on conditions to be determined in each case by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 94</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to comply with the decision of the International Court of Justice in any case to which it is a party.</li><li>If any party to a case fails to perform the obligations incumbent upon it under a judgment rendered by the Court, the other party may have recourse to the Security Council, which may, if it deems necessary, make recommendations or decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 95</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nothing in the present Charter shall prevent Members of the United Nations from entrusting the solution of their differences to other tribunals by virtue of agreements already in existence or which may be concluded in the future.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 96</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;a.</strong>&nbsp;The General Assembly or the Security Council may request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question.<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>b.</strong>&nbsp;Other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies, which may at any time be so authorized by the General Assembly, may also request advisory opinions of the Court on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XV: THE SECRETARIAT</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 97</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Secretariat shall comprise a Secretary-General and such staff as the Organization may require. The Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. He shall be the chief administrative officer of the Organization.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 98</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Secretary-General shall act in that capacity in all meetings of the General Assembly, of the Security Council, of the Economic and Social Council, and of the Trusteeship Council, and shall perform such other functions as are entrusted to him by these organs. The Secretary-General shall make an annual report to the General Assembly on the work of the Organization.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 99</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Secretary-General may bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 100</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>In the performance of their duties the Secretary-General and the staff shall not seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other authority external to the Organization. They shall refrain from any action which might reflect on their position as international officials responsible only to the Organization.</li><li>Each Member of the United Nations undertakes to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and the staff and not to seek to influence them in the discharge of their responsibilities.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 101</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The staff shall be appointed by the Secretary-General under regulations established by the General Assembly.</li><li>Appropriate staffs shall be permanently assigned to the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, and, as required, to other organs of the United Nations. These staffs shall form a part of the Secretariat.</li><li>The paramount consideration in the employment of the staff and in the determination of the conditions of service shall be the necessity of securing the highest standards of efficiency, competence, and integrity. Due regard shall be paid to the importance of recruiting the staff on as wide a geographical basis as possible.</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XVI: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 102</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations after the present Charter comes into force shall as soon as possible be registered with the Secretariat and published by it.</li><li>No party to any such treaty or international agreement which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article may invoke that treaty or agreement before any organ of the United Nations.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 103</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the event of a conflict between the obligations of the Members of the United Nations under the present Charter and their obligations under any other international agreement, their obligations under the present Charter shall prevail.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 104</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfilment of its purposes.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 105</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the fulfilment of its purposes.</li><li>Representatives of the Members of the United Nations and officials of the Organization shall similarly enjoy such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the independent exercise of their functions in connexion with the Organization.</li><li>The General Assembly may make recommendations with a view to determining the details of the application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article or may propose conventions to the Members of the United Nations for this purpose.</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XVII: TRANSITIONAL SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 106</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pending the coming into force of such special agreements referred to in Article 43 as in the opinion of the Security Council enable it to begin the exercise of its responsibilities under Article 42, the parties to the Four-Nation Declaration, signed at Moscow, 30 October 1943, and France, shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 5 of that Declaration, consult with one another and as occasion requires with other Members of the United Nations with a view to such joint action on behalf of the Organization as may be necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 107</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XVIII: AMENDMENTS</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 108</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 109</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>A General Conference of the Members of the United Nations for the purpose of reviewing the present Charter may be held at a date and place to be fixed by a two-thirds vote of the members of the General Assembly and by a vote of any nine members of the Security Council. Each Member of the United Nations shall have one vote in the conference.</li><li>Any alteration of the present Charter recommended by a two-thirds vote of the conference shall take effect when ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations including all the permanent members of the Security Council.</li><li>If such a conference has not been held before the tenth annual session of the General Assembly following the coming into force of the present Charter, the proposal to call such a conference shall be placed on the agenda of that session of the General Assembly, and the conference shall be held if so decided by a majority vote of the members of the General Assembly and by a vote of any seven members of the Security Council.</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">CHAPTER XIX: RATIFICATION AND SIGNATURE</h4>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 110</h5>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>The present Charter shall be ratified by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.</li><li>The ratifications shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the signatory states of each deposit as well as the Secretary-General of the Organization when he has been appointed.</li><li>The present Charter shall come into force upon the deposit of ratifications by the Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, and by a majority of the other signatory states. A protocol of the ratifications deposited shall thereupon be drawn up by the Government of the United States of America which shall communicate copies thereof to all the signatory states.</li><li>The states signatory to the present Charter which ratify it after it has come into force will become original Members of the United Nations on the date of the deposit of their respective ratifications.</li></ol>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Article 111</h5>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The present Charter, of which the Chinese, French, Russian, English, and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall remain deposited in the archives of the Government of the United States of America. Duly certified copies thereof shall be transmitted by that Government to the Governments of the other signatory states.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IN FAITH WHEREOF the representatives of the Governments of the United Nations have signed the present Charter. DONE at the city of San Francisco the twenty-sixth day of June, one thousand nine hundred and forty-five.</p>



<div style="height:20px" aria-hidden="true" class="wp-block-spacer"></div>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Reprinted from <a href="https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/">UN&#8217;s website</a>.</h6>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://fapa.org/charter-of-the-united-nations/">Charter of the United Nations (1945)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://fapa.org">Formosan Association for Public Affairs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://fapa.org/charter-of-the-united-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4477</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
