<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: House Foreign Affairs Committee Unanimously Passes &#8220;Six Assurances&#8221; Legislation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fapa.org/house-foreign-affairs-committee-unanimously-passes-six-assurances-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fapa.org/house-foreign-affairs-committee-unanimously-passes-six-assurances-legislation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chunnan Hsu		</title>
		<link>https://fapa.org/house-foreign-affairs-committee-unanimously-passes-six-assurances-legislation/#comment-2</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chunnan Hsu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://fapa.org/wp/?p=56#comment-2</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear FAPA,

Thank you for all of your efforts. However, as I checked the original text of the Resolution, the Six Assurances never mentions anything to do with &quot;the Republic of China&quot; as given in your press release. Please check the original below.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/88/text

I am wondering what led to this discrepancy and deeply concerned if that is due to FAPA&#039;s position with regards to Taiwan Independence. 

Your reply would be highly appreciated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear FAPA,</p>
<p>Thank you for all of your efforts. However, as I checked the original text of the Resolution, the Six Assurances never mentions anything to do with &#8220;the Republic of China&#8221; as given in your press release. Please check the original below.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/88/text" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/88/text</a></p>
<p>I am wondering what led to this discrepancy and deeply concerned if that is due to FAPA&#8217;s position with regards to Taiwan Independence. </p>
<p>Your reply would be highly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
